Reply
Thread Tools
James_Littler's Avatar
Posts: 820 | Thanked: 436 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Portsmouth, UK.
#1
I was using transmission to download a film and it crashed, had to use the end current task in the power menu, then reboot to make the device responsive again.

After a reboot, I tried resuming the download only to be given a read only error, so I removed the torrents from transmission and tried deleting them through filebox, to no avail, and then through a root shell, still nothing. Great, I love vfat!

So I ran the usual

root
umount /home/user/MyDocs
fsck -a /home/user/MyDocs

answered yes to the prompts to fix files.

It's now been going for 14 hours 30 mins and is still working.

What I want to know is, whether this is 'normal' or whether I should just cut my losses and reflash, or if anyone has any other ideas.

Cheers
 
Posts: 8 | Thanked: 8 times | Joined on Oct 2010
#2
not normal.
 
dchky's Avatar
Posts: 549 | Thanked: 298 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ Australian in the Philippines
#3
Very "not normal" - I'd be inclined to hook it up to your PC and run a file system check from there.
 
James_Littler's Avatar
Posts: 820 | Thanked: 436 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Portsmouth, UK.
#4
It's going through renaming the contents of my /MyDocs/Downloads directory, all the file names are unreadable, it's renaming them to nice fsck001.001 type name, so I may leave it for a little while longer, the film was a good few gig and failed after about half an hour, so I imagine there's alot of files to go through and rename.
 
Posts: 1,425 | Thanked: 983 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Hong Kong
#5
In retrospetive you shouldn't download to your internal flash....

You know, normal flash has limited number of r/w before failure; and yes, that includes fsck. What you're doing is decreasing drastically the lifetime of your internal flash.

I'd back MyDocs and flash the eMMC if I were you.
 
James_Littler's Avatar
Posts: 820 | Thanked: 436 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Portsmouth, UK.
#6
Originally Posted by 9000 View Post
In retrospetive you shouldn't download to your internal flash....

You know, normal flash has limited number of r/w before failure; and yes, that includes fsck. What you're doing is decreasing drastically the lifetime of your internal flash.

I'd back MyDocs and flash the eMMC if I were you.
Yea, hindsight is a great thing...

I'm at work at the moment so I'll leave this to work it's self to death and then flash tonight if it's not sorted.
 
dchky's Avatar
Posts: 549 | Thanked: 298 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ Australian in the Philippines
#7
Originally Posted by 9000 View Post
In retrospetive you shouldn't download to your internal flash....

You know, normal flash has limited number of r/w before failure; and yes, that includes fsck. What you're doing is decreasing drastically the lifetime of your internal flash.

I'd back MyDocs and flash the eMMC if I were you.
Given that the number of write cycles within the N900 is probably somewhere around the 1 to 5 million mark, I personally wouldn't even bother to care. You would need to be running fsck for a very long time to make much of a dent - your N900 is likely to fail for other reasons long before that anyway. It'd take probably a decade or so to wear out the flash.

Last edited by dchky; 2010-11-02 at 13:31.
 
James_Littler's Avatar
Posts: 820 | Thanked: 436 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Portsmouth, UK.
#8
Got bored watching it so I cancelled it after 16 hours, plugged it in via USB and deleted the files using windows.

I don't know why I even started the fsck, I should have just stuck my PC on last night but I really couldn't be bothered.

Is there any way I can check everything's back how it should be, a script I can run?

I can create and delete folders, so I guess that's a start lol.
 
Posts: 1,425 | Thanked: 983 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Hong Kong
#9
Originally Posted by dchky View Post
Given that the number of write cycles within the N900 is probably somewhere around the 1 to 5 million mark
Can you verify your claim?
 
James_Littler's Avatar
Posts: 820 | Thanked: 436 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Portsmouth, UK.
#10
Originally Posted by 9000 View Post
Can you verify your claim?
SLC NAND is usually rated to around 1,000,000 P/E cycles, then you have to take into account wear leveling.
Personally I think 1-5m is rather conservative.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to James_Littler For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:33.