Actually most the devices already got something similar. Example zune hd, ipod/iphone, s^3 phones you press power button for 10 sec to do the same thing as taking the battery out and back. Having own off/on button would be quite a waste and something that... well would be bad sign for the customer.
how it is implemented doesn't matter.
i just want that button, that relyably independent of the state of the software turns the phone off and really off so and when you turn it on again(from really off) it is in a defined start state.
So what?
This is one and non-representing occurrence in Nokia phones (btw, my USB port is pretty solid and I have my N900 for almost a year now).
it is representing. and i think nokia has realized that it is in its press statements.
the big difference defines the class of the device. the small things define the quality and the usability.
it is representing. and i think nokia has realized that it is in its press statements.
the big difference defines the class of the device. the small things define the quality and the usability.
No its not. If it was, it'd have happened in the N97, N97 mini, N96, N86, etc.
And again I remind you - say the USB port got detached in 5000 devices, still the majority of the devices did not have their port detached (neither did mine), so this is probably a production problem in a specific series of devices.
In fact, finding another Nokia product with such a defect won't be such an easy chore, I can assure you...
lets settle this: this is a wishlist for a to come phone: better quality.
usb(might stumble over a wire)
touchscreen(want to carry it in my pockets together with keys)
waterresistant(not waterproof but rain shouldn't hurt it)
fallresistant
and yeah: a charger that is capable of charging the phone and doesn't go up in flames....
....
and all that tested makes the big difference in quality
this are shortcommings of the n900 reg. quality and sure wishlistitems for futur phones..
No its not. If it was, it'd have happened in the N97, N97 mini, N96, N86, etc.
And again I remind you - say the USB port got detached in 5000 devices, still the majority of the devices did not have their port detached (neither did mine), so this is probably a production problem in a specific series of devices.
In fact, finding another Nokia product with such a defect won't be such an easy chore, I can assure you...
Limited occurrence, hasn't affected me fortunately. Design flaws aside, drop a Galaxy S and an N900 5 times onto concrete. Which one do you think would survive?
I don't understand what confusion there could be concerning OVI?
if they brand the phone as meego and developers submit application that will not work on future real meego devices it will create fragmentation and confusion on developers and end users , plus they need to implement in ovi store another category of OS just for 1 phone.
Anyway they can't brand an OS as meego unless it's compatibile with meego.
lets settle this: this is a wishlist for a to come phone: better quality.
usb(might stumble over a wire)
touchscreen(want to carry it in my pockets together with keys)
waterresistant(not waterproof but rain shouldn't hurt it)
fallresistant
and yeah: a charger that is capable of charging the phone and doesn't go up in flames....
....
and all that tested makes the big difference in quality
this are shortcommings of the n900 reg. quality and sure wishlistitems for futur phones..
If it comes down to Nokia investing more time and effort into building a more powerful phone, and not one as prone to your accidents and small pockets, I would prefer they build a more powerful phone.
A phone that cost me nearly $700 does not go in the same pocket as my keys. And I certainly don't feel the need to use it while it's raining. And while falls happen, I certianly don't think Nokia should waste too much time and resources in "toughbooking" their phones. Just be careful with your phone.
