Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    u-boot for the RX-51 (N900)

    Reply
    Page 4 of 23 | Prev |   2     3   4   5     6   14 | Next | Last
    xopher | # 31 | 2010-10-31, 19:17 | Report

    I'm having trouble.
    I grabbed kernel-power40's deb
    extracted the fiasco from it
    unpacked fiasco via flasher
    renamed zImage to uImage
    ran pybuilder.py using the provided u-boot.bin
    FROM PC: flasher -k combined.bin -l -b
    Result: Error: can't find kernel image

    What have I missed, overlooked, or botched?
    Thanks

    edit: left one step out

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Matan | # 32 | 2010-10-31, 19:43 | Report

    Don't rename zImage to uImage. You need to convert it with u-boot's mkimage tool. It is explained where the files are downloadable from:

    http://al.robotfuzz.com/~al/maemo/u-boot/

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to Matan For This Useful Post:
    xopher

     
    xopher | # 33 | 2010-10-31, 20:07 | Report

    That did it, thank you very much.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    jorgecallejas | # 34 | 2010-11-12, 07:51 | Report

    Please help me .I do not what happen but a penguin show up while I was installing a full charged battery it do not time out, I can not turn off my n900 and if I remove the battery and reinstall it the penguin show up on power on.
    How can go back to maemo , when I typed the command

    run mmcboot it said wrong image format comand
    ERROr : can not get kernel image

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by jorgecallejas; 2010-11-12 at 13:45.
    The Following User Says Thank You to jorgecallejas For This Useful Post:
    lolloo

     
    MasterZap | # 35 | 2010-11-12, 08:49 | Report

    The problem with u-boot (beyond the forcing-it-on-us debacle that happened in titan's 44 kernel which was rather unfortunate) is that it breaks together with multiboot.

    And I really don't fancy having to have one OS per SD card and having to put SD cards in and out. To me, multiboot was way more versatile; it gave me a boot menu with OS options, I could even have maemo-vanilla, maemo-power, meego and nitdroid on the same machine with no tedios SD card swapping.

    What are the actual benefits of u-boot? I don't accept the wear-on-flash-memory argument at all (are you gonna boot and switch OS's thousands of times? really?)

    /Z

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to MasterZap For This Useful Post:
    lolloo

     
    nicola.mfb | # 36 | 2010-11-12, 09:20 | Report

    Simple: multiboot depends on maemo, so it does not support any kernel/any OS and if you brick the maemo mtd partition (or multiboot-flash a kernel that is not able to mount maemo and/or execute it's userspace) you are not able to boot any other OS.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Stskeeps | # 37 | 2010-11-12, 12:43 | Report

    Originally Posted by MasterZap View Post
    The problem with u-boot (beyond the forcing-it-on-us debacle that happened in titan's 44 kernel which was rather unfortunate) is that it breaks together with multiboot.

    And I really don't fancy having to have one OS per SD card and having to put SD cards in and out. To me, multiboot was way more versatile; it gave me a boot menu with OS options, I could even have maemo-vanilla, maemo-power, meego and nitdroid on the same machine with no tedios SD card swapping.

    What are the actual benefits of u-boot? I don't accept the wear-on-flash-memory argument at all (are you gonna boot and switch OS's thousands of times? really?)

    /Z
    There is nothing that stops you from using boot.scr feature (partition 1) or make a custom u-boot binary with something like 'run mmc1' or the likes. The benefit is than multiboot is that multiboot sucks for anything that doesn't boot from NAND.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post:
    lma, theonelaw

     
    Stskeeps | # 38 | 2010-11-12, 12:44 | Report

    I've just uploaded a new uboot-pr13 that explictly conflicts with kernel-power and kernel-maemo and kernel-hostmode.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Stskeeps For This Useful Post:
    cfh11, debernardis, DrWilken, lma, sbock, Sourav.dubey, SubCore

     
    geneven | # 39 | 2010-11-12, 12:56 | Report

    I'm not sure where to put this information since it involves several programs, but uboot saved me from an inconvenient incident just now.

    I received authorization requests from someone identified as Marcy Raptor. At first I didn't know where they were coming from. Eventually I discovered they were from Skype and I picked a menu item that blocked them.

    But before that I noticed that my calendar program listed the birthday of someone called -- Marcy Raptor. I spent a few minutes getting rid of it.

    Then I noticed that some parts of my Desktop-Switcher icons were missing, icons that would be a hassle to recreate.

    Just recently I had backed up everything with uboot. I restored and everything seems fine now.

    I am using the latest of Titan's kernels, Matan's modified desktop.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to geneven For This Useful Post:
    theonelaw

     
    geneven | # 40 | 2010-11-12, 13:20 | Report

    Originally Posted by Stskeeps View Post
    I've just uploaded a new uboot-pr13 that explictly conflicts with kernel-power and kernel-maemo and kernel-hostmode.
    Just out of curiosity, isn't there a way to coordinate this stuff before it goes public? Or am I missing something?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to geneven For This Useful Post:
    lolloo

     
    Page 4 of 23 | Prev |   2     3   4   5     6   14 | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout