Implement fmms in the main conversations app! make a button on the top with new mms next to the existing new sms. and let the messages from mms being shown in the conversation list. it cant be that hard to make...
A standalone app indeed sucks. implement it! and it would be awsome.
oh yeah dont forget the button in a contact with the option to send mms
That would require re-writing the whole conversations app (and probably the address book too), which is no easy task.
The conversations app is closed source and therefore cannot be modified like open source elements.
Implement fmms in the main conversations app! make a button on the top with new mms next to the existing new sms. and let the messages from mms being shown in the conversation list. it cant be that hard to make...
A standalone app indeed sucks. implement it! and it would be awsome.
oh yeah dont forget the button in a contact with the option to send mms
you missed one point:
how in heavens name you can do that? I have lost almost all my hope about getting vertsms somehow even hacked to conversations app....
Just wanted to say I've used fmms since it came out and have had no issue with it. It works when I need to use it and I receive mms with ease. Thanks you frals for the app it suits everything I need.
@ericsson
Even if your points were valid, I really do believe that you should reconsider how you describe your thoughts. It is always okay to tell the truth and to express an opinion, but that doesn't excuse you from being respectful to others.
Anyway, I figure you're just trolling, but the 0.1% chance that you're not probably justifies this off topic post.
@frals
Thanks for fMMS, it does everything I need it to.
ericcson, honey, this your mommy, would you please shut the fvck up so the adults can talk. Thanks, sweety, I'll see you at dinner. I'm making your favorite: PB & J with the crusts cut off. Now, put your jacket on, it's cold out there, and stop troller these nice people.
MMS is the kind of app I don't use often. But the times I need it it is absoutely crucial, nothing else will work as an alternative.
fMMS enables a rudimentary MMS funtionality on the N900, but let's be honest. As an app it sucks plain and simple. Anyone working on a better alternative?
Get the hell on outta here and don't let the door hit you on the way out.
Well, you see that's the thing. My points are valid. You are of the false opinion that they aren't. I don't care what you think. fMMS is an app like millions of other apps. I have never met frals, as I have never met 99.99% of authors of other apps. Frals is probably a nice guy, but frals is not the issue here, fMMS is.
To me fMMS suck. It suck because it only does a fraction of what an MMS app is supposed to do. That fraction it does, is not the functionality I want. I too can use fMMS, I have no problems with that, but I can't use it for all the things normal MMS apps can be used for, and not for the things I use MMS the most
So, if you (or anyone else) have no clue of what I am talking about, as it is obvious that you don't have, then why bother? Or if you really do know what I am talking about, why do you pretend you don't? Is there something with frals I don't know about? I just wondering because you act like babies for no reason. What about Ovi maps with no turn by turn voice navigation, is that OK as well? are you satisfied with that crippled functionality as well?
I suggest you do a search of the Maps related threads and and fMMS related threads to see if you can find the people who think both fMMS and Maps are perfect. Then, when you have compiled that table please post it on the discussion.nokia.com forum. I ask this for three reasons:
Doing the research required to answer your question related to consumer opinion of Maps and fMMS should take several hours, maybe even days. That is time you are NOT spending repeating yourself in this thread.
It will introduce you to the official Nokia community forum where I am sure you will be welcomed almost as warmly as you have been here.
Having done that research in the threads you might pick up on the culture of this society as it relates to descriptive terms for programs. For example the phrase "does not perform ______ function" is a perfectly acceptable alternative to the ambiguous and perjorative term "sucks".
I believe whole heartedly that had your initial post substituted the more precise formula suggested for the less precise term "sucks" this thread might have followed a different course.
Words have meanings, use the words that express what you mean. If "sucks" is as deep as your analytical skills can take you then I believe something other than an N900 is probably a better communication solution for you.
