Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    [Announce] bleeding-edge wl1251 wifi driver for Maemo Fremantle

    Reply
    Page 14 of 53 | Prev | 4   12     13   14   15     16   24 | Next | Last
    SWFu | # 131 | 2011-01-02, 16:08 | Report

    Originally Posted by alexystems View Post
    Mates to end this conversation i don't won any sort of explanation to any of you.

    Happy new year
    At least he removed the link! Still a dickish thing to do in the first place though!

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by SWFu; 2011-01-02 at 16:27.

     
    RedMatterInc | # 132 | 2011-01-02, 23:31 | Report

    David Gnedt,
    Thanks for the driver patch, I'm looking forward to the link so I can try it out. I've tried the wl1251 driver which supposedly does injection at the cost of draining the battery, but to no avail. I made sure to do my part and throw some money your way. I'm sure it'll be worth every penny

    Update: I confirmed that injection is working, as I can associate to with the AP while in monitor mode. However, when I run `nice yes | nice aireplay-ng -5 -b "00:14:BF:2A:5C:00" -h "3C:F7:2A:2B:3D:F9" "wlan0"` on the N900, it eventually results in the wlan0 interface going down. Running the exact same command on my laptop works fine (which is using the ath9k driver, which also has the injection patch). Has anyone else ran into this problem? If so, have you found a solution, or a workaround?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by RedMatterInc; 2011-01-03 at 04:09.

     
    RedMatterInc | # 133 | 2011-01-03, 04:17 | Report

    Originally Posted by Punter View Post
    i was able to setup the card in monitor mode bt when i test for the injection it fails.
    aireplay-ng --test wlan0
    That's a good way to test. I followed the instructions in the README (only the required steps and the customized osso-wlan step). After rebooting and running `sh load.sh` I ran the same test using aireplay-ng and it confirmed that injection was working. I'm not sure what's wrong in your case. Try checking to see if the driver is loaded using `lsmod`, that the interface is up `ifconfig wlan0` and make sure the card is in monitor mode using `iwconfig wlan0`. Also, don't foget that you need to run load.sh each time you reboot (unless you make some changes to run this automatically on boot).

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    snakekontrol | # 134 | 2011-01-03, 04:20 | Report

    +1 for Chrome petition, I can't get to boot in multiboot either

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    kaos_king | # 135 | 2011-01-03, 10:36 | Report

    Ive donated. Looking forward to testing.

    N900 gets better & better!

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    James_Littler | # 136 | 2011-01-03, 10:58 | Report

    I left my wifi on with the new driver loaded over night and I was greeted by 0.4% charge this morning, I had 80% last night..
    I can't say definitively yet but this driver seems to use quite a bit more battery than the default one when left to idle.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to James_Littler For This Useful Post:
    Mentalist Traceur

     
    eikido | # 137 | 2011-01-03, 11:22 | Report

    Originally Posted by James_Littler View Post
    I left my wifi on with the new driver loaded over night and I was greeted by 0.4% charge this morning, I had 80% last night..
    I can't say definitively yet but this driver seems to use quite a bit more battery than the default one when left to idle.
    If you'd unload the drives when you don't need the drivers, will you still have bad battery? Surely you rarely need these drivers all the time on?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    RobbieThe1st | # 138 | 2011-01-03, 12:58 | Report

    This looks interesting, to say the least.

    I'm thinking about donating and getting a copy, but before I do so, I would like to see confirmation of the argument happening on the last two pages, namely: Are the patches GPL'd or not?
    lxp, could you please give a definitive answer here? I assume they -are- GPL, but confirmation would make me a lot happier.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    bruno_banani | # 139 | 2011-01-03, 17:02 | Report

    I just want to ask what is the difference between this patch and the folder, that came with neopwn(packet_injection), because I was able to install everything from "packet_injection" and inject in all channels and capture a handshake and injection is ok.? Do I need this patch?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by bruno_banani; 2011-01-03 at 18:52.

     
    hawaii | # 140 | 2011-01-03, 17:54 | Report

    This is publicly available, direct from the original author - and incorporated patches from the PR1.3 and community kernel.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to hawaii For This Useful Post:
    Mentalist Traceur

     
    Page 14 of 53 | Prev | 4   12     13   14   15     16   24 | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout