Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#121
Originally Posted by wmarone View Post
Come on man, the hardware in question was probably killed months ago, back when Ari Jaaksi left. I dare say, Eldar is late to this party. As for the new hardware, it was probably already in development if not done.
yes I dont dissagree that Eldar is a idiot and the fact that N9 probadly was dished long time ago, but still we all know Nokia has alot of delays and is still not in sync with the Qt development/ovistore and so on this is bad for its time to deliver.

Just an example, I am one of the people that infact has "lobbyied" for using qt-components instead of libmeegotuch but at the same time I wonder what the hell is going on inside nokia, after three days no answers from nokia at the meego-touch mailinglist someone blogged about it:

http://confusingdevelopers.wordpress...qtqc-survival/

Question was, what is the status of qt-component and what shall be used by the app developers...

Taking a look at the gitorious qt-components and most of the latest patches seems to be symbian related patches...

Last edited by mikecomputing; 2011-01-27 at 18:41.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mikecomputing For This Useful Post:
Posts: 222 | Thanked: 205 times | Joined on Jul 2009 @ Finland
#122
Originally Posted by mikecomputing View Post
Just an example, I am one of the people that infact has "lobbyied" for using qt-components instead of libmeegotuch but at the same time I wonder what the hell is going on inside nokia, after three days no answers from nokia at the meego-touch mailinglist someone blogged about it:

http://confusingdevelopers.wordpress...qtqc-survival/
I am that "someone". Is there something you still find confusing that I could clarify?
__________________
'QtDone'. Getting things done (GTD) was never this cheap!

'QmlReddit' reads Reddit!
 
NvyUs's Avatar
Posts: 1,885 | Thanked: 2,008 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ OVI MAPS
#123
I think Nokias First device will be harmattan and not the skipping to MeeGo 1.2 like people was saying.

http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-15851

Now this is probably the case i think a device is closer than ppl think
 
Posts: 122 | Thanked: 46 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#124
Originally Posted by tissot View Post
For somebody who actually joined this forum because of harmattan i have been waiting for the first harmattan, now MeeGo(or MeeGo-Harmattan) device for 2-3 years. it's getting a bit tiring to say the least.
I truly hope one of the devices Intel has talked about to be shown in MWC will be Nokia indeed.

Some more rumours. Already made couple of threads for these rumours so i'll just post it here. These pics are from mobile-review forums.


http://lists.meego.com/pipermail/meego-kernel/
http://forum2.mobile-review.com/show...d=1#post912492

Looks like a test platform?
I am with you mate. I got fed up with Nokia. I sold my N900 today for £100.00, I just want to get rid of it ... fast. I will never ever buy another NOkia device again, they've shown no respect or care to us all by neglecting the maemo platform. even if a more powerful meego-harmattan-tarzan-batman-superman nokia phone is released in the future, I'll never ever be interested.
 
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 2,100 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#125
Originally Posted by NvyUs View Post
I think Nokias First device will be harmattan and not the skipping to MeeGo 1.2 like people was saying.

http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-15851

Now this is probably the case i think a device is closer than ppl think
Old issues that deal more with Qt than Harmattan itself don't say much as to what's happening internally with Nokia. Never mind that they couldn't ever call themselves MeeGo or even "MeeGo compliant" or use the trademarks if they were to proceed with the original MeeGo/Harmattan plan. Nokia would be wholly foolish to do so.

Originally Posted by fergusso View Post
I am with you mate. I got fed up with Nokia. I sold my N900 today for £100.00, I just want to get rid of it ... fast. I will never ever buy another NOkia device again, they've shown no respect or care to us all by neglecting the maemo platform. even if a more powerful meego-harmattan-tarzan-batman-superman nokia phone is released in the future, I'll never ever be interested.
Yet people ignore the swaths of ignored Android devices from vendors like Samsung and Motorola, many of which came and were dropped in less time than it took to go from PR1.1 to PR1.3.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post:
NvyUs's Avatar
Posts: 1,885 | Thanked: 2,008 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ OVI MAPS
#126
It was Filed in December against a Harmattan device image so not old at all and says a lot really considering rumour was going around months before that, that they was moving straight to meego 1.2, theres bugs filed with harmattan for this month too

Created:03/Dec/10 7:30 PM
Updated:23/Dec/10 8:27 AM
Resolved:06/Dec/10 1:27 PM

here have another.
http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTMOBILITY-862

Created:14/Dec/10 1:47 PM
Updated:Thursday 2:55 AM
Resolved:19/Jan/11 3:01 AM

Last edited by NvyUs; 2011-01-30 at 03:39.
 
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 2,100 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#127
Originally Posted by NvyUs View Post
It was Filed in December against a Harmattan device image so not old at all and says a lot really considering rumour was going around months before that, that they was moving straight to meego 1.2, theres bugs filed with harmattan for this month too

Created:03/Dec/10 7:30 PM
Updated:23/Dec/10 8:27 AM
Resolved:06/Dec/10 1:27 PM
And "Harmattan" could now simply be the internal codename for their version of the OS. I doubt it represents anything that it was planned to, especially with regard to being a "hybrid" that still used .deb packages.
 
NvyUs's Avatar
Posts: 1,885 | Thanked: 2,008 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ OVI MAPS
#128
ok answer this question this is an update of Qt mobility api project status on different platforms posted 9th January
Harmattan is listed as different platform to MeeGo and API maturity is further along than MeeGo
I dont think its just an internal name they carried on using for MeeGo, its still a hybrid imo if it still uses .deb is another story.
http://doc.qt.nokia.com/qtmobility-1.2/

Last edited by NvyUs; 2011-01-30 at 04:16.
 
Posts: 81 | Thanked: 20 times | Joined on Sep 2010
#129
Originally Posted by Milhouse View Post
The truth is that MeeGo has been anticipated for so long, and with MeeGo hyped as the "saviour of Nokia" by engadget m0r0ns it would be a grave mistake to then launch MeeGo on last years hardware.
So what is your creditial to call engadget "*****s"???

I think it is pretty much common sense for Nokia to continue remaining as one of the big players in mobile market is a successful launch of Meego. You can not win the upgrading war with samsung/LG/htc. Being a participant in that is gonna drag Nokia down. I think they know it.
 
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#130
Originally Posted by turbowei View Post
So what is your creditial to call engadget "*****s"?
For most folks around here... the only credential necessary to call Engadget anything negative is because they're not American whereas Engadget is (according to them) biased towards Apple or any other American technology and/or fan favorite.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
cia debunked, its true, n9 is a myth, no kia, scifi, top secret


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:07.