Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 84 | Thanked: 32 times | Joined on Sep 2010 @ Ames IA, USA
#1

During a conference call, Intel CEO Paul Otellini claimed Nokia abandoned the MeeGo project because of financial reasons.

He further expressed his surprise that Nokia's CEO sided with Windows Phone rather than Android, and claimed MeeGo was the best option, also noting it would be hard for Nokia to differentiate itself from other manufacturers in the WP ecosystem:

"I wouldn't have made the decision he [Elop] made, I would probably have gone to Android if I were him. MeeGo would have been the best strategy but he concluded he couldn't afford it.

It would have been less hard on Android, on MeeGo he could have done it."

Despite Nokia's decision to side with WP, Paul Otellini remains optimistic that Intel will find new partners for MeeGo:

"We will find other partners. The carriers still want a third ecosystem and the carriers want an open ecosystem, and that's the thing that drives our motivation."

MeeGo definitely looked promising, and probably still does so, but, understandably, questions have been raised about its future since Nokia joined the Windows Phone bandwagon. What's your opinion on this one - do you think MeeGo has a future in the smartphone/tablet business?

Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...71G32N20110217
__________________
Admin of
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to txh For This Useful Post:
Posts: 5,795 | Thanked: 3,151 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Agoura Hills Calif
#2
I don't see how this post does anything but invite us to rediscuss what has been discussed ad infinitum.

"How much do I have to pay to get out of going thru all these things twice." Bob Dylan
__________________
All I want is 40 acres, a mule, and Xterm.
 
Banned | Posts: 706 | Thanked: 296 times | Joined on May 2010
#3
Who cares. Of course it was a financial decision. It always is in corporations. Only uneducated fools flame the conspiracy themes.
 
gerbick's Avatar
Posts: 6,668 | Thanked: 15,030 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ undecided.
#4
So wait. They made this decision based on money? Thought Nokia had substantial reserves?
__________________
Tschüß
 
rm42's Avatar
Posts: 963 | Thanked: 626 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Connecticut, USA
#5
Originally Posted by BigBadGuber! View Post
Who cares. Of course it was a financial decision. It always is in corporations. Only uneducated fools flame the conspiracy themes.
Not so fast. Just about any time Microsoft is involved in a deal you can pretty much count on something shady going on. It's like an addiction. They can't help themselves.
__________________
-- Worse than not knowing is not wanting to know! --

http://temporaryland.wordpress.com/

Last edited by rm42; 2011-02-18 at 03:21.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:12.