Active Topics
-
How many of you still use N900 as main phone? (595)
to Community by deutch1976 - 21 hrs, 6 mins ago -
Big news (7)
to OS2008 / Maemo 4 / Chinook - Diablo by endsormeans - 2 days, 6 hrs ago -
Firefox with Leste (8)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by endsormeans - 2 days, 6 hrs ago -
Which is the best N95? What software modifications could be made to it? (3)
to General by Kalatti - 5 days, 6 hrs ago -
Installing CSSU Stable in year 2024 (2)
to Maemo 5 / Fremantle by teroyk - 5 days, 14 hrs ago -
Porting apps to Leste (34)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Arno_11 - 5 days, 23 hrs ago - more...
|
2011-02-21
, 00:21
|
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Prague
|
#2
|
BTW let me know if that cap file works for you.
Thanks again
Thanks again
|
|
2011-02-21
, 01:28
|
|
Posts: 2,225 |
Thanked: 3,822 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Florida
|
#3
|
I'm not an expert by any means, but: Does your aircrack-ng on your linux box contain an actual password list with which to work with? Does the aircrack-ng on your N900? (Also, are you using an aircrack-ng you compiled yourself, or the one from the repos?)
|
|
2011-02-21
, 02:28
|
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Prague
|
#4
|
its the one from the repo and aircrack on the n900 does not even find the handshake packets in the .cap file so it makes the wordlist a bit irrelevant.
But yes I'm using the same worklist in both Debian and Maemo
But yes I'm using the same worklist in both Debian and Maemo
|
|
2011-02-21
, 02:46
|
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Prague
|
#6
|
hawaii thanks just as I thought same file on my n900 reports no valid handshake hmmm could I ask are you using the aircrack-ng from the repo?
 |
|
2011-02-21
, 02:52
|
|
Posts: 1,030 |
Thanked: 792 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
|
#7
|
No, I am using the latest SVN sources.
|
|
2011-02-21
, 03:04
|
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Prague
|
#8
|
Maybe I'm going a bit of-topic here but whenever I try and build the sources on the n900 I just get a message telling me the make version I'm using is to old.
How do you build from source for Maemo do i need to do it in scratchbox on another machine, or can it be done on the device itself? If it can be done on the device itself where do i fine a newer version of make. Sorry bout the noob questions.
Any pointers in the right direction here greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Dave
How do you build from source for Maemo do i need to do it in scratchbox on another machine, or can it be done on the device itself? If it can be done on the device itself where do i fine a newer version of make. Sorry bout the noob questions.
Any pointers in the right direction here greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Dave
|
|
2011-02-21
, 23:06
|
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Prague
|
#9
|
Sorted installed scratchbox and read the docs easy when you know how.
Thanks again for the help
Thanks again for the help
|
|
2011-02-21
, 23:10
|
|
Posts: 1,680 |
Thanked: 3,685 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
|
#10
|
so what? are you trying to hak the gibson?
__________________
N900: One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.
I found this odd so I analysed the file with wireshark and found the 4 wpa handshake packets I was expecting. I then transfered the .cap file to my linux box and used aircrack again, there was indeed a wpa handshake in there. I then transfered some .cap files to my n900 that I know have valid handshakes and on the n900 they all say no valid handshake found.
I've attached a .cap file (its from my network, the wpa password is 'password') this file was captured on the n900 and according to both the windows and linux versions of aircrack it contains a valid handshake. I know it does I've seen the packets in wireshark.
The version of aircrack-ng I'm using on the n900 is 1.0 and it does not see the handshake in that file.
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks
Dave