![]() |
2010-09-19
, 16:17
|
|
Posts: 2,041 |
Thanked: 1,066 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Houston
|
#101
|
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 18:34
|
Posts: 134 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Russia,Moscow
|
#102
|
No, that is called rationalization. You see if something has no value, then they're not interested in it. If software has no value no one would want to use it. If a song has no value no one would want to listen to it. If a movie has no value no one would want to watch it.
What you're saying is people rationalize to themselves that they should not pay for it because they can get it for free. It has value, otherwise they wouldn't put in the time or the effort to pirate it.
I find it interesting that you know it's wrong but do it anyways. At least you know it's wrong.
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 18:53
|
Posts: 992 |
Thanked: 738 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Low Earth Orbit
|
#103
|
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 19:08
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#104
|
We need a new poll: whose mind has been changed as a result of points made in this thread...
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 19:37
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#105
|
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 20:46
|
Posts: 307 |
Thanked: 157 times |
Joined on Jul 2009
@ Illinois, USA
|
#106
|
What we need is a poll that doesn't use a question asking if it's "ok". There is no OK. There's legal, moral, possible, likely, etc.
What happens if it's legally possible and morally wrong? What do we do about precedent, since it's a limited point of view, legal-wise (not the only law)?
Should a singer get 5 million for a song? No. But they do, so if you restore the natural order of things it's a regression and they feel like they've been wronged.
Free market works by reality not by law. That is, it's a system that self-adapts to the reality, not defined by rules. As a result, it's not a rule that a company should get fifty million for a game because they pumped 40 in it. You pump whatever you feel like and get what you get - that's it.
It has always been my opinion that once you make something public, it's public, deal with it.
The worst part is, once you make some concessions, the box is open. Like, say, not allowing user to re-sell the game. What does the company care who owns the game? Why pay again to re-register online? It's still one slot.
The line between "greed" and "right" is no more.
So, which OK is it? Moral? Legal? What's "right"? "Even"? "Best"?
And since when do excuses count? Is rape OK because you "can't get a woman"? Why would theft be OK because "I can't afford it"?
I buy most of my software now that I can afford it, what I can't I pirate. Don't remember ever thinking it was OK because of it.
And since MS keeps popping out in the thread *and students), did you know MS "sells" 4$ licenses to organizations that prove the OS will be used for learning? Several universities I talked to got upgraded to W7 Pro free.
So let's be honest. Being a student does allow you access to software (we got Windows, Office, AutoCAD, and a few other mammoths). This isn't about access, this is about personal use for whatever reasons. And being a student doesn't factor into it.
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 20:53
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#107
|
Anybody thinking of arguing with this should just stop, because you're wrong.
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 21:44
|
|
Posts: 2,050 |
Thanked: 1,425 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bucharest
|
#108
|
Children should be seen and not heard
[...] full ignorance on how the free market works.
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 22:23
|
Posts: 515 |
Thanked: 259 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#109
|
Well, I used the wrong word as I see now. Not value definately. I meant that people don't see the value of somebody's work or knowledge and recieve everything as given.
And this topic too. As I said before, almost everyone in my country wil call you an idiot if you buy software instead of using pirate one. People can't understand it and won't in the nearest future. And reading you all is a good example people are different. And I like it.
But, as I said before I still use some pirate software. There're different reasons for that, here are some:
1) Something like Win7 cost sh*tloads of money and prices aren't the same as in your country. World isn't the same everywhere, we don't have student discounts or any other similar stuff. It must be lame excuse but still.Working to get an original version of software - it sounds ridiculuos for me, ppl work for living not for things.
![]() |
2010-09-19
, 23:56
|
Posts: 838 |
Thanked: 292 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#110
|
![]() |
Tags |
bollocks!, here be pirates, pirateparty ftw |
|