Active Topics
-
How many of you still use N900 as main phone? (595)
to Community by deutch1976 - 1 day, 12 hrs ago -
Big news (7)
to OS2008 / Maemo 4 / Chinook - Diablo by endsormeans - 2 days, 21 hrs ago -
Firefox with Leste (8)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by endsormeans - 2 days, 21 hrs ago -
Which is the best N95? What software modifications could be made to it? (3)
to General by Kalatti - 5 days, 22 hrs ago -
Installing CSSU Stable in year 2024 (2)
to Maemo 5 / Fremantle by teroyk - 6 days, 5 hrs ago -
Porting apps to Leste (34)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Arno_11 - 6 days, 15 hrs ago - more...
misiak |
2011-05-05
, 20:23
|
|
Posts: 804 |
Thanked: 1,598 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gdynia, Poland
|
#131
|
Originally Posted by geneven
WHAT could cause the temperature reading to be SO inaccurate that it would jump above 100C?
Anyway, the temperature is refreshed once in a while (I'm too lazy to check how often in sources:P), so even if one or two readings would be inaccurate, after next reading it would read correct temperature (because if I were to decide, I would check this >100 condition during every reading of temperature, because I'm a very lazy person and a bad coder who makes bloatware software using more CPU than it should 
)
 |
|
2011-05-05
, 20:35
|
|
Posts: 311 |
Thanked: 376 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
@ Hungary
|
#132
|
Originally Posted by geneven
Maybe QCPUFreq could read out the uname -r string and decide to work on v46 or v47 mode
Clever and might be worth doing, but it's risky because let's pretend something else causes the temperature reading to be inaccurate. Dividing by ten might not be a universal fix.
Last edited by zdanee; 2011-05-05 at 20:40.
|
|
2011-05-05
, 20:49
|
|
Posts: 804 |
Thanked: 1,598 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gdynia, Poland
|
#133
|
Originally Posted by zdanee
Also clever, but it may be too much work, because early versions of power kernel 47 doesn't even have "power" in output of uname and have "pali" instead. And who knows what will change and how it would look like in future
Maybe QCPUFreq could read out the uname -r string and decide to work on v46 or v47 mode
Personally, I like my ">100 condition" option, because it's easiest to implement, I guess :P
|
|
2011-05-05
, 22:14
|
|
Posts: 311 |
Thanked: 376 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
@ Hungary
|
#134
|
Originally Posted by misiak
Okay, how about keeping it simple? Let the user decide in settings. For noobs there could be some explanation in the about menu, or some suggestion at first startup.
Also clever, but it may be too much work, because early versions of power kernel 47 doesn't even have "power" in output of uname and have "pali" instead. And who knows what will change and how it would look like in future
|
|
2011-05-05
, 23:22
|
|
Posts: 804 |
Thanked: 1,598 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gdynia, Poland
|
#135
|
Originally Posted by zdanee
Are you sure people who spam 10 pages of thread still asking "wtf why temperature is 300C?!?!?!" again and again will find an option in menu and will know what they should choose? :P One of examples is: see posts 277-287 on page http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=71879&page=28 (and next page), one of tags explains all - "noobs-cant-read" :P
Okay, how about keeping it simple? Let the user decide in settings. For noobs there could be some explanation in the about menu, or some suggestion at first startup.
| The Following User Says Thank You to misiak For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-05-11
, 10:55
|
|
Posts: 617 |
Thanked: 338 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#136
|
How could I set min freq to 125 ? I used kernel-config limit 125 1000 but it puts 250 min freq .
|
|
2011-05-11
, 10:59
|
|
Posts: 804 |
Thanked: 1,598 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gdynia, Poland
|
#137
|
Originally Posted by Dragoss91
Did you also changed avoided frequencies? What does output of "kernel-config show" say? I know that by default 125 and 250 frequencies are disabled and you need to remove them from avoided frequencies list.
How could I set min freq to 125 ? I used kernel-config limit 125 1000 but it puts 250 min freq .
|
|
2011-05-11
, 11:20
|
|
Posts: 617 |
Thanked: 338 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#138
|
Yes , they are on avoided frequencies list . How do I remove them ?
|
|
2011-05-11
, 11:36
|
|
Posts: 804 |
Thanked: 1,598 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Gdynia, Poland
|
#139
|
Originally Posted by Dragoss91
I don't know as I never needed to use it, but you may need to use command "kernel-config load /path/to/config/file". To see example config files, please see files in /usr/share/kernel-power-settings, for example "/usr/share/kernel-power-settings/ideal" has avaliable values in variable FREQS starting with 500. Try adding to your profile (it's "ideal" or "default" profile if you haven't made any changes, I'm not sure) the values from other profile which supports it. For example in ulv profile:
Yes , they are on avoided frequencies list . How do I remove them ?
FREQS="0:30,90 125:30,90 250:380,180 [... leave rest of the list from your default profile unchanged, just make sure you don't have duplicates, so if you already had value beginning with "250:" you don't need to add it]
| The Following User Says Thank You to misiak For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-05-11
, 11:40
|
|
Posts: 617 |
Thanked: 338 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#140
|
Well , I just found the avoided_freq file in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/ondemand and now I can set 125 too . Now I am gonna make my presets . Thank you for help .