|
2006-10-30
, 16:44
|
|
Posts: 1,361 |
Thanked: 115 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
#12
|
|
2006-10-30
, 18:42
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#13
|
|
2006-10-30
, 19:45
|
|
Posts: 832 |
Thanked: 75 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
@ Phoenix, AZ
|
#14
|
|
2006-10-30
, 20:02
|
|
Posts: 1,361 |
Thanked: 115 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
#15
|
|
2006-10-30
, 20:42
|
Posts: 16 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Oct 2006
|
#16
|
|
2006-10-30
, 20:47
|
Posts: 162 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
|
#17
|
SD69. I agree... I've never once been sitting there with my 770 thinking "Damn, I wish I had a (probably) crappy low res webcam"
|
2006-10-30
, 20:56
|
Posts: 269 |
Thanked: 139 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
|
#18
|
|
2006-10-30
, 21:41
|
Posts: 550 |
Thanked: 110 times |
Joined on Aug 2006
|
#19
|
|
2006-10-30
, 22:21
|
|
Posts: 1,245 |
Thanked: 421 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
|
#20
|
- Exhibit 3: External photos
- Exhibit 7: Test setup photos
- Exhibit 8: User's manual
- Exhibit 9: Internal photos
The request was signed 19oct. So maybe we'll get more info at start of December. Here's hoping
Also another person has spotted that the SAR test contains the following text on page 12:
- With MC / Without headset, Camera extended / 0.390
So camera is looking like a good posibility (the stick out thingy on the photo).