Active Topics
-
How many of you still use N900 as main phone? (595)
to Community by deutch1976 - 3 days, 5 hrs ago -
Big news (7)
to OS2008 / Maemo 4 / Chinook - Diablo by endsormeans - 4 days, 14 hrs ago -
Firefox with Leste (8)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by endsormeans - 4 days, 14 hrs ago - more...
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2009-06-29
, 03:13
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#12
|
Originally Posted by linuxeventually
Hardly. armv5 binaries works just fine on armv7 CPUs. Backwards compatibility is strong, problems crop up when you try to use features on newer instruction sets (like the NEON SIMD available in armv7) on older hardware which does not provide the required features.
I've had similar thoughts with my NAS but anything with an ARM architecture (and keep in mind pretty much all ARM processors are different so no compatibility) everything has to be compiled against that particular processor.
It's no different than x86, really.
__________________
Ryan Abel
Ryan Abel
Last edited by GeneralAntilles; 2009-06-30 at 00:39.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-06-29
, 08:14
|
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#13
|
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles
I think it's more software related - you do do have a little more platform diversity which can give a little headache not usually present on most x86 - like endianness, uclibc, thumb related stuff, so it's not always that easy, but the general principle IS the same.
Hardly. armv5 binaries works just fine on armv7 CPUs. Backwards compatibility is strong, problems crop up when you try to use features on newer instruction sets (like the NEON SIMD available in armv7) on older hardware which does not provide the required features.
It's no difference than x86, really.
| The Following User Says Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2009-06-29
, 19:25
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#14
|
I would love to see some hardware hackers build an open Internet Tablet device that could run Maemo or Mer... I would buy one, especially if it is the N800 form factor with faster hardware inside.
But having seen the problems that the Pandora guys have been encountering, I think it's a safe bet that nobody's going to do it.
I think you have to be a Big Company to be able to pull off something like that.
But having seen the problems that the Pandora guys have been encountering, I think it's a safe bet that nobody's going to do it.
I think you have to be a Big Company to be able to pull off something like that.
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to qole For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2009-06-29
, 20:09
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#15
|
Originally Posted by qole
Especially once (if?) Pandora does come through; at that point, there's already one open Maemo-capable machine, which will nearly saturate the market, but the hurdles for anyone else to launch a new one would be the same.
I would love to see some hardware hackers build an open Internet Tablet device that could run Maemo or Mer... I would buy one, especially if it is the N800 form factor with faster hardware inside.
But having seen the problems that the Pandora guys have been encountering, I think it's a safe bet that nobody's going to do it.
OTOH, the Pandora guys might be in a position to release the same thing in a different form-factor; IMHO it could be based on the same circuit-board, screen, etc., just a different case mainly (and less components). Unfortunately, as a gaming-centric operation, they're not likely to pursue that option...
__________________
World's first inductively-charged N900!
World's first inductively-charged N900!
| The Following User Says Thank You to Benson For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-06-29
, 21:03
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#16
|
Originally Posted by Benson
I don't think they'll bother with other form factors for the simple reason that those of us who desire a tablet are probably going to say, "good enough," with either the Pandora or the N900. Sure, we'd want a tablet, but not that much. If told that you can buy a clamshell (Pandora) or slider smartphone (alleged N900) now, or wait another 9 months or more for a tablet, what would you do?
...at that point, there's already one open Maemo-capable machine, which will nearly saturate the market... the Pandora guys might be in a position to release the same thing in a different form-factor... as a gaming-centric operation, they're not likely to pursue that option...
Yeah, me too.
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
 |
|
2009-06-29
, 21:17
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#17
|
And If you have the equipment to replace BGA soldered chips I know a few thousand Palm T|X owners that may want to have a word with you 
|
|
2009-06-29
, 21:21
|
|
Posts: 1,950 |
Thanked: 1,174 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Seattle, USA
|
#18
|
Originally Posted by qole
I'd wait and keep using my N800. I'm not a gamer and Pandora is way too big for what I want. And I don't want no phone. You too, qole?
If told that you can buy a clamshell (Pandora) or slider smartphone (alleged N900) now, or wait another 9 months or more for a tablet, what would you do?
Yeah, me too.
I have to admit I'm surprised! 
|
|
2009-06-29
, 21:43
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#19
|
GeraldKo:
Well, I was talking about those of us who want a tablet but want something faster. (That's what the thread is about.) But you know that, you're just teasing.
I agree with your assessments of the two form factors, especially since I'm not a big gamer, I don't own a mobile phone and data plans in Canada involve mortgaging your home and/or children.
Well, I was talking about those of us who want a tablet but want something faster. (That's what the thread is about.) But you know that, you're just teasing.
I agree with your assessments of the two form factors, especially since I'm not a big gamer, I don't own a mobile phone and data plans in Canada involve mortgaging your home and/or children.
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
| The Following User Says Thank You to qole For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2009-06-29
, 22:05
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#20
|
Personally, I prefer the clamshell form factor. The biggest reason being that it lets you have a spread out area for all the circuits AND have a larger keyboard, fewer moving parts.. and most important of all: SCREEN PROTECTION.
What do you gain for trading upgradeability? Smaller, more inexpensive devices.
Ryan Abel