Active Topics
-
How many of you still use N900 as main phone? (595)
to Community by deutch1976 - 3 days, 12 hrs ago -
Big news (7)
to OS2008 / Maemo 4 / Chinook - Diablo by endsormeans - 4 days, 21 hrs ago -
Firefox with Leste (8)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by endsormeans - 4 days, 21 hrs ago - more...
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to nodevel For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2015-04-13
, 16:20
|
|
Posts: 49 |
Thanked: 72 times |
Joined on Aug 2012
|
#272
|
Originally Posted by nodevel
Jolla tablet. N9 and Jolla?
Looking at today's blogpost at Jolla Blog, can anyone identify the third device on this picture?
https://cdn-blog.jolla.com/wp-conten...n_Projects.jpg
Here's just the cropped image.
http://i.imgur.com/pCr1Qb8.jpg
It could be some Nexus device for all I know, but why would it be there next to Jolla and Jolla Tablet?
I seems way too big, though, so I'm not sure if I want it to be the next device.
|
|
2015-04-13
, 18:21
|
|
Posts: 752 |
Thanked: 2,808 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Czech Republic
|
#273
|
Originally Posted by djbengan
You couldn't think of a less probable option?
Jolla tablet. N9 and Jolla?
What on earth would N9 do between Jolla Tablet and Jolla, when SailfishOS for N9 is not fully functional and never will be?? 
Jolla Tablet is on the left, Jolla (1) is definitely the one in the middle (dimension comparisons with the tablet fit exactly). The question is what's the device on the right side.
Some math (very very rough - what else can you get from a tiny image
):Code:
[Name] [Device height (pic)] [Screen height (pic)] Jolla Tablet 203mm (56px) ~160mm (42px) Jolla 131mm (36px) ~100mm (27px) ??? ~145mm (40px) ~120mm (33px) [Name] [Device width (pic)] [Screen width (pic)] Jolla Tablet 137mm ~120mm Jolla 68mm ~56mm ??? ~73mm (20px) ~62mm (17px) [Name] [Screen size] [Screen ratio] Jolla Tablet 7.85" 4:3 Jolla 4.5" ~1.8:1 ??? ~5.3" ~1.9:1
|
|
2015-04-13
, 21:35
|
|
Posts: 49 |
Thanked: 72 times |
Joined on Aug 2012
|
#274
|
Originally Posted by nodevel
hmmmm, i guess ur right... something makes me think oneplus. Jolla would never make a 5+ device... hopefully.
You couldn't think of a less probable option?
Jolla Tablet is on the left, Jolla (1) is definitely the one in the middle (dimension comparisons with the tablet fit exactly). The question is what's the device on the right side.
Some math (very very rough - what else can you get from a tiny image
Code:[Name] [Device height (pic)] [Screen height (pic)] Jolla Tablet 203mm (56px) ~160mm (42px) Jolla 131mm (36px) ~100mm (27px) ??? ~145mm (40px) ~120mm (33px) [Name] [Device width (pic)] [Screen width (pic)] Jolla Tablet 137mm ~120mm Jolla 68mm ~56mm ??? ~73mm (20px) ~62mm (17px) [Name] [Screen size] [Screen ratio] Jolla Tablet 7.85" 4:3 Jolla 4.5" ~1.8:1 ??? ~5.3" ~1.9:1
|
|
2015-04-14
, 08:32
|
|
Posts: 735 |
Thanked: 1,054 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
|
#275
|
a putative Jolla2 is now far enough into the future that i really do expect it to arrive with TypeC USB. given that we are looking at Sept 15 at the earliest i will be disappointed if it is sporting microUSB when it is announced.
| The Following User Says Thank You to Jedibeeftrix For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2015-04-14
, 08:47
|
|
Posts: 6,445 |
Thanked: 20,981 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#276
|
Yet another connector? Incomparible with everything I have in my arsenal? No, thanks.
__________________
Русский военный корабль, иди нахуй!
Русский военный корабль, иди нахуй!
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2015-04-14
, 10:44
|
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#277
|
Originally Posted by pichlo
Anything is better than microusb... it was the bad choice from the beginning, only adopted universally because manufacturers were such cheapskate bastards.
Yet another connector? Incomparible with everything I have in my arsenal? No, thanks.
|
|
2015-04-14
, 11:26
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 5,320 |
Thanked: 4,464 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#278
|
Originally Posted by Jedibeeftrix
I doubt very much that we'll see something shipping his year, happy to be mistaken though.
...given that we are looking at Sept 15 at the earliest...
What are licensing costs like for Type-C, are they high, Intel part of the working group?
Most spec'n lately, has been pointing to Jolla most likely being in bed in bed with Intel, so would they be helping them out?
| The Following User Says Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2015-04-14
, 11:42
|
|
Posts: 735 |
Thanked: 1,054 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
|
#279
|
Originally Posted by pichlo
you can't ignore the future, chap.
Yet another connector? Incomparible with everything I have in my arsenal? No, thanks.
otherwise you'd still be banging out COBOL on your Sparc mainframe.
besides which, it is the one port to rule them all:
10gb/sec data
100W power
displayport over USB
PCIe over USB
it'll rock your world!
| The Following User Says Thank You to Jedibeeftrix For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2015-04-14
, 11:53
|
|
Posts: 735 |
Thanked: 1,054 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
|
#280
|
Originally Posted by jalyst
me either, sadly. but at least my nexus 5 will have done two years of solid service by then. just hope this time around we get some specs worth paying for, quite happy with the software.
I doubt very much that we'll see something shipping his year, happy to be mistaken though.
What are licensing costs like for Type-C, are they high, Intel part of the working group?
Most spec'n lately, has been pointing to Jolla most likely being in bed in bed with Intel, so would they be helping them out?
re licensing fees, i don't believe there are any. from wiki:
"A vendor ID is necessary for obtaining a certification of compliance from the USB-IF. The USB-IF is responsible for issuing USB vendor IDs to product manufacturers. The cost for issuing this number is US$5,000. Additionally, the use of a trademarked USB logo to identify certified devices requires license fee of US$3,500 for a 2-year term.[1] Some microcontroller manufacturers offer a free or low cost sublicense of their vendor ID for development/testing and limited production (generally under 10,000 units). Vendors offering this free service include:"
dell seem quite happy about the prospect of cherry trail (14nm - X5/X7) atom products being able to support type C USB:
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct...90790515,d.d2s
this is one reason why I questioned a few weeks back whether Jolla support would be limited to the cheaper Intel bay trail SoC (22nm - X3):
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php...00#post1462900
| The Following User Says Thank You to Jedibeeftrix For This Useful Post: | ||
Here's just the cropped image.
It could be some Nexus device for all I know, but why would it be there next to Jolla and Jolla Tablet?
I seems way too big, though, so I'm not sure if I want it to be the next device.