|
2011-07-20
, 08:56
|
|
Posts: 1,789 |
Thanked: 1,699 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#22
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Kangal For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-07-20
, 12:07
|
Posts: 94 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#23
|
You can see this thread for comparison on the performance of those cards.
Surprisingly some cheaper ones are better than the expensive ones :O
THREAD@xda
|
2011-07-20
, 12:14
|
Posts: 94 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#24
|
|
2011-07-20
, 12:17
|
Posts: 958 |
Thanked: 483 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#25
|
|
2011-07-20
, 16:05
|
Posts: 1,258 |
Thanked: 672 times |
Joined on Mar 2009
|
#26
|
thanks for the info. the benchmark program is not as accurate as it should be?
and is there any possibility that the card can perform even lower than it's said benchmark?
|
2011-08-12
, 20:24
|
Posts: 94 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#27
|
have you try test it???
did you try comparing 16Gb sandisk class 2 vs 16Gb A-Data class 10 on speed???
give me the benckmark as your proof so i can believe it...
My Phone Evolution : Nokia 3650-Nokia 6600-Nokia 6630-Motorola Rizr-Sony P1i-Nokia E63-Nokia X3-Samsung E980-Iphone 2G-Sony W595-Nokia E71-Nokia 5800-Nokia N900-HTC Hero-Xperia Mini Pro