The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Matan For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-04-25
, 19:58
|
|
Posts: 259 |
Thanked: 55 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Vilnius, Lithuania
|
#22
|
![]() |
2010-04-25
, 20:24
|
Posts: 1,427 |
Thanked: 2,077 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Sydney
|
#23
|
![]() |
2010-04-25
, 22:36
|
Posts: 255 |
Thanked: 109 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#24
|
Locking the processor at 500/550/600 will fry the device!!!
Don't lock it, the device knows what to do on its own.
![]() |
2010-04-26
, 07:39
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#25
|
Using titan's new kernel, even 550mhz uses less voltage than stock Nokia kernel did at 250mhz. The word overclocking seems to cause bad vibes. We are running the cpu more efficiently and cooler than Nokia's stock kernel ever did. So please, do your homework before swearing at the 'overclockers'. Not everyone is dumb and overclocking is nothing new. That Nokia engineer dude actually said frequency is not the problem. It's the high voltages that Nokia's stock kernel uses. My cpu right now uses less voltage at 950mhz than what your non overclocked cpu uses at 600mhz. Nokia is the one actually overclocking the cpu by over volting the cpu heavily from 550mhz onwards. I'll bet my cpu runs much cooler with less stress at 850mhz than stock N900 at 600mhz.
![]() |
2010-04-26
, 08:09
|
Posts: 1,224 |
Thanked: 1,763 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#26
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Matan For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-04-26
, 08:10
|
Posts: 155 |
Thanked: 61 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#27
|
titans kernel with "ideal" settings has 500 idle and seems to me a much nicer option all round, less stuttering and believe it or not, better battery life too.
queen beecon can be used for simple commands as "widgets"
the things on the right are clock settings that i can alter just by pressing them. the black ones at the top and bottom show me what is running at the time, high and low mhz and they update by clicking or when the desktop is refreshed.
![]() |
2010-04-26
, 08:12
|
Posts: 155 |
Thanked: 61 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#28
|
you cannot get accurate data about device temperature unless you open the covers up and stick a temperature sensor to multiple places. but then again airflow is changed significantly because no covers are on.... so I'd take those "more efficiently and cooler" -arguments with a 10 ton pile of salt.
(e: and I mean when talking with scientifically measurable, repeatable etc terms, not in "I got a feeling" -level used by the overclockers)
![]() |
2010-04-26
, 08:16
|
Posts: 478 |
Thanked: 101 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#29
|
![]() |
2010-04-26
, 08:28
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#30
|
In contrast to the very scientific "Nokia said" method used by anticlockers.
System heat is a bad argument against overclocking. There are a few worse heat generators in the N900, including the battery and the UMTS radio.
In addition - for a given task the heat generation is almost independent of frequency, since power used is proportional to frequency, but time needed is inversely proportional. Heat increases proportionally to square of voltage, and most overclockers use lower voltage then default Nokia settings, thus using less power, and generating less heat.
Of course, some activities (such as some games or video playing) might use the additional frequency to do more, and thus generate more heat for apparently the same work. But for more normal tasks (such as web browsing), overclocking results in less heat generated and less battery used, as almost any overclocker reports.
Droid, with the same CPU, designed by Motorola for running at a maximum of 550MHz is already being overclocked for over 3 months, without any reported ill effects.
My repository
"N900 community support for the MeeGo-Harmattan" Is the new "Mer is Fremantle for N810".
No more Nokia devices for me.