Active Topics
-
Porting apps to Leste (32)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Arno_11 - 3 days, 7 hrs ago -
[ANNOUNCE] CSSU-thumb thread - stable Thumb2 on N900 (2,264)
to Maemo 5 / Fremantle by panjgoori - 5 days, 2 hrs ago -
Full linux distros on Sailfish OS (254)
to SailfishOS by qoh - 6 days ago - more...
|
2012-10-07
, 06:54
|
|
Posts: 992 |
Thanked: 738 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Low Earth Orbit
|
#42
|
Originally Posted by gerbick
Symbian has been a full multitasking OS since day one. Its predecessors EPOC32 and EPOC16 (SIBO) were also full multitasking OSes - this was back in the days when Windows had trouble singletasking (nowadays Windows has improved to the point where it can run multiple trojans/malware/viruses at the same time as well as whatever program you're running in the foreground). Even in allowing full multitasking, Symbian phones still have the best battery life on the market.
I think you've stumbled upon a potential annoyance where you can override the pause feature of music on your Symbian based phone and called it multi-tasking. That's still task switching in my personal book but with an override of a control that's meant to stop media from playing.
Originally Posted by gerbick
Very true. Unfortunately (or fortunately) hardware development has been improving much faster than software development. Hence it doesn't make commercial sense to spend a year or two to optimise your software to run on current hardware when by that time your software will "automatically" run twice as fast on the newer hardware.
The programmers then knew how to code without so much bloat. Efficiency isn't practiced any longer by no means - why do it because the fast GPU, CPU and RAM combo can allow bad programmers to look halfway decent.
Nor did your Psion (I SO wanted one!) have to deal with the same number of systems, 3D graphics, colors and what not that people expect now.
Still... that device was so ahead of its time man. People could learn so much from those "simpler" times.
Whilst Psion did fairly well in Europe with their fully multitasking, decent screen/keyboard/applications & expandable PDAs, Americans were happy with the Palm Pilots with their tiny screens and no keyboards and limited storage. And history is repeating itself.
| The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to kureyon For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-10-07
, 07:04
|
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#43
|
Funny how the "superior" tech just keeps on losing and how the Americans get blamed each and every time.
Oh well. Do better next time perhaps? We'll love the next great tech perhaps.
Oh well. Do better next time perhaps? We'll love the next great tech perhaps.
| The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-10-07
, 08:44
|
|
Posts: 661 |
Thanked: 1,625 times |
Joined on Apr 2012
@ Croatia,Zagreb
|
#44
|
Well I know that this "multitasking" is copied from first wiindows 95..or xp.
 |
|
2012-10-07
, 08:54
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#45
|
Originally Posted by flopjoke
I do.
@Dave999 I don't see the point of that. At any instant of time, you're either browsing or watching a video. No one does BOTH at the SAME time.
I do when I watch TV (browse wikipedia to look up things they talk about on TV).
I do on my PC (keep surfing while watching a video that isn't exactly about quantum mechanics).
I used to on a tablet even though it didn't display both the browser an the video at the same time. It was good that I could listen to the video while switching to the browser only for a few seconds.
The worst thing in UI design is to assume what people won't do.
| The Following User Says Thank You to benny1967 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-10-07
, 09:06
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#46
|
Originally Posted by herpderp
Isn't it a bit snotty to assume we fail to understand?
Most of you seem to fail to understand WHY iOS and Android enforce a very strict control over what runs in the background.
Just search this forum for misterious battery drains on the N900 and N9. There is a tradeoff here, they restricted background processes (you CAN run bakcground tasks like downloads/uploads, music player, anything), so that amateur programmers creating bad apps don't waste battery power.
On Maemo, it was easy for a badly written app to consume all the battery easily, because it could run in the background without any safeguards.
It may well be that performance and battery issues are the reasons why some popular OSs don't allow real user-controlled multi-tasking.
On the other hand, some users may prefer having total control. Control always includes risks. I can deal with such risks. I know what to do when suddenly, after I installed an application, battery life goes down significantly. I know what to do when my device slows down more and more because of the many applications running in the background.
Still, I want to be able to keep them running if I have a reason to. I want to be able to decide for myself what's more important to me at the moment, battery life or the output of one special application that keeps crunching numbers in the background.
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to benny1967 For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2012-10-07
, 09:19
|
|
Posts: 7,074 |
Thanked: 9,069 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#47
|
There is one thing more to consider. When computers gets more and more advanced users tend to run more and more things. At some point you lose visibility of the list anyway. Don't think a driver of a car or a pilot in a plain want be able to check processes running, but expect subsystem handle that and only show the user the relevant data or information. While the mobile devices aren't their yet. It's not long until they could run, controlled lots of things at the same time and the user must get help to handle processes and memory and tasks.
__________________
Do something for the climate today! Anything!
I don't trust poeple without a Nokia n900...
Do something for the climate today! Anything!
I don't trust poeple without a Nokia n900...
|
|
2012-10-07
, 09:25
|
|
Posts: 329 |
Thanked: 422 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ derpton
|
#48
|
Originally Posted by benny1967
I didn't say nobody understood.
Isn't it a bit snotty to assume we fail to understand?
It may well be that performance and battery issues are the reasons why some popular OSs don't allow real user-controlled multi-tasking.
On the other hand, some users may prefer having total control. Control always includes risks. I can deal with such risks. I know what to do when suddenly, after I installed an application, battery life goes down significantly. I know what to do when my device slows down more and more because of the many applications running in the background.
Still, I want to be able to keep them running if I have a reason to. I want to be able to decide for myself what's more important to me at the moment, battery life or the output of one special application that keeps crunching numbers in the background.
I respect your choices, and I understand that you (as most people here) are power users. But when designing a piece of hardware + software, one has to make compromises - in this case either you do the full multitasking thing, or you do the android-ios thing, doing both is not economically feasible (plus average users will get confused).
And choosing the more fail-safe solution is better when you consider a huge (and mostly non-tech savvy) userbase.
| The Following User Says Thank You to herpderp For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2012-10-16
, 07:17
|
|
Posts: 308 |
Thanked: 299 times |
Joined on Jul 2012
@ Graveyard
|
#49
|
Originally Posted by imo
You can do it on a Symbian S60v3 device. I had a Nokia N73 and I used to play 2 songs simultaneously
Where you can play audio and videos together other than maemo5 through media player and km player ,two songs for example ,together ??? i really dont know about n9 but does it happen on any other device other than N900 ?
One using the default media player and another one using the app - Xplore
__________________
Last edited by ranbaxy; 2012-10-16 at 07:43.
 |
|
2012-10-16
, 10:06
|
|
Posts: 426 |
Thanked: 374 times |
Joined on Apr 2012
@ Middle East
|
#50
|
Originally Posted by ste-phan
Well, the whole idea about owning a personal device is so you can use it to help you in life. And yes, a mobile PHONE is supposed to make phone CALLS. That was the whole point of it.
And what about multi-user , multitasking? One browsing the web, while the other watching video?
Limiting usage scenario's has no end until you are back at the starting point only making simple phone calls.
Those features are pretty good, yes, but not for a device that is around 4.5" in length. Those features would be pretty great on a tablet or laptop.. which they are and that is why they were invented. Those are the portable devices which should allow multi-user scenario - doing it on a tiny mobile phone might be "cool", but that's about it.
Originally Posted by benny1967
EXACTLY. A TV.. a laptop.. a tablet.. all devices are meant to do that. As I said above, features like those are a nice addition in a mobile phone, but it makes more sense on a larger screen than on a handheld device.
I do.
I do when I watch TV (browse wikipedia to look up things they talk about on TV).
I do on my PC (keep surfing while watching a video that isn't exactly about quantum mechanics).
I used to on a tablet even though it didn't display both the browser an the video at the same time. It was good that I could listen to the video while switching to the browser only for a few seconds.
The worst thing in UI design is to assume what people won't do.
Even if you do watch a video while browsing the internet, you're wasting screen area for the browser and it makes it harder for you to navigate. But making the screen larger isn't the answer; now you're just compromising between a tablet and a phone. A handheld device that makes phone calls shouldn't be so huge that it looks like you stuck a book to your face. Sure, people will get used to it eventually, but it's just silly.
Make calls and do the essential things on the move using a phone, use a laptop for other things. If you want to do both, use a tablet - that's what they're created for. Personally, I think trying to fit all these features into a small device and compromising battery life, more harmful radiation, interaction with the REAL world, marketing it as the best device.. these are all just commercial stuff to get people buying a device which probably is only extremely useful to 0.001% of the "rich" population.
__________________
Architectural Engineer and Graphic Designer.
[Contact me for any designing work.]
Portfolio: AKstudios : : graphics with attitude.
Flickr: AKstudios
Twitter: @flopjoke
Architectural Engineer and Graphic Designer.
[Contact me for any designing work.]
Portfolio: AKstudios : : graphics with attitude.
Flickr: AKstudios
Twitter: @flopjoke
Limiting usage scenario's has no end until you are back at the starting point only making simple phone calls.