Active Topics

 


Page 972 of 1048 « First 962970971 972 973974982 Last »
Reply
Thread Tools
mooglez is offline mooglez
2011-10-15 , 17:37
Posts: 136 | Thanked: 150 times | Joined on Dec 2010 @ Finland
#9711
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Then why the **** aren't we talking about sales numbers. Real, hard mother****ing numbers.

Let's see them. Sprint, AT&T, Verizon all are touting "best numbers" for a device. Samsung talks about their Galaxy S II sale numbers.

Nokia? Dead silent.
As far as I know, Nokia has never ever given out sales numbers for a specific device. That policy also prevents them from touting the numbers like the others are doing.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to mooglez For This Useful Post:
JamesBond@ge is offline JamesBond@ge
2011-10-15 , 17:38
Banned | Posts: 726 | Thanked: 497 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ Gravesend, UK
#9712
Originally Posted by dansus View Post
You obviously have no interest in the N9 and what it represents, so why are you here?
I have great interest <removed>. Otherwise how would I know how much it costs, where I could get it from if I had more money than sense, how unsupported and dead it is going to be.

How would I know all these things if I "wasn't interested"?

Of course I'm interested. I'm also hideously disappointed. Next smart arse remark please.......
Last edited by Reggie; 2011-10-15 at 17:42.
 
lsolano is offline lsolano
2011-10-15 , 17:41
Posts: 235 | Thanked: 163 times | Joined on Dec 2008 @ Costa Rica
#9713
Originally Posted by JamesBond@ge View Post
= bigger community

= more longevity of said device
How did I forget the community! Thanks for the reminder indeed.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to lsolano For This Useful Post:
smegheadz's Avatar
smegheadz is offline smegheadz
2011-10-15 , 17:55
Posts: 387 | Thanked: 566 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Dublin
#9714
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Only if you're comparing which one sold the most. I'm not doing that.

Look above at what I stated. I'm not even asking for sales numbers to bolster any argument I would have.

Rather see the sales go hand-in-hand to getting more work out of the Harmattan team. As it stands, it's the only path that Nokia has that makes sense to me. WP7 doesn't - and I own a WP7 device.
i'd love to see the same road as you. but i know it's not going to happen. to you it makes sense, to the heads of nokia it doesn't. unless we know their plan we won't know why it does. we lack all the pieces of the puzzle to figure it out. maybe in 2 years time we'll have more or all the pieces to understand the choice they made earlier this year.

i'd rather see people here put their efforts towards constructive things then destructive. i think it's time we stopped using this thread and use/make new ones on what we want to discuss.

Edit:
i know your point originally is nokia need the same enthusiasm with their userbase as apple do. would you really want those people on this forum though?
__________________
Never argue with stupid people.They lower you to their level then beat you with experience.
Humility is something we should all taste.
Last edited by smegheadz; 2011-10-15 at 18:01.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to smegheadz For This Useful Post:
gerbick
2011-10-15 , 18:00
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#9715
Originally Posted by mooglez View Post
As far as I know, Nokia has never ever given out sales numbers for a specific device. That policy also prevents them from touting the numbers like the others are doing.
In the Nokia quarterly reports - I'm searching for 2007 and earlier - they used to have highlights of their sales.

Weird how Wikipedia has "numbers" - not saying they're actual, but they support what Symbian-Freak and the Nokia quarterly reports happen to say.

And Nokia took to Twitter for the 5800 announcement of sales.

Nokia has done it in the past. Sadly I'm not finding it right now.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post:
jalyst is offline jalyst
2011-10-15 , 18:07
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#9716
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Oh, and now we hear that the iPhone 4S is the first Bluetooth 4 phone.
BT4? Really, source? Cheers.
 
gerbick
2011-10-15 , 18:10
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#9717
Originally Posted by jalyst View Post
BT4? Really, source? Cheers.
Obligatory Engadget link... and screenshot from Apple.com
Attached Images
 
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post:
jalyst is offline jalyst
2011-10-15 , 18:17
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#9718
Originally Posted by smoku View Post
OMG. You sissypants, you came here for consolation?
This is just pathetic... Grow up some balls.
It was just highlighting what some others had pointed-out about the attitude of some devs.
I was always skeptical about it...
But some others have since pointed-out, how I coud've misunderstood what you were saying.
Perhaps you were just trying to be helpful, right?
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post:
jalyst is offline jalyst
2011-10-15 , 18:22
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#9719
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Obligatory Engadget link... and screenshot from Apple.com
Bummer.
Poo, pissy, poo, pooo

Good Night.
 
phatman2600 is offline phatman2600
2011-10-15 , 18:23
Posts: 27 | Thanked: 9 times | Joined on May 2010
#9720
Originally Posted by aironeous View Post
look at your package tracking. It just arrived in New Jersey
Does that mean it just landed in the US? Isn't Jersey their main location for international shipments?
 
Reply
Page 972 of 1048 « First 962970971 972 973974982 Last »

Tags
disapoint, eflop, epic win!, laggy interface, n9 rox, so much win, wateriswet, who cares, whyyyyy??????

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:36.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top