|
|
2008-02-06
, 21:35
|
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#2
|
|
|
2008-02-06
, 22:19
|
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#3
|
|
|
2008-02-06
, 23:09
|
|
Posts: 348 |
Thanked: 61 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#4
|
|
|
2008-02-07
, 01:53
|
|
|
Posts: 716 |
Thanked: 236 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#5
|
|
|
2008-02-07
, 02:09
|
|
Posts: 10 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#6
|
|
|
2008-02-07
, 02:19
|
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#7
|
|
|
2008-02-07
, 04:23
|
|
Posts: 348 |
Thanked: 61 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#8
|
Which would save batter life more: using the onboard GPS or an external GPS via Bluetooth?
My gut says that the onboard GPS will use less power than the Bluetooth transmitter. But...does anyone have experience or even a guess?
Thanks.