|
|
2008-03-08
, 18:01
|
|
Posts: 46 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
|
#2
|
I've just got a new SD card; is there any reason why I shouldn't choose ext2 as the filesystem type for it, as opposed to VFAT?
The advantages of ext2 would be that it can host symlinks, uid/gid, etc, etc.
The downside of ext2 would be that it does't get automounted, but I can work around that, by putting it in /etc/fstab, and I imagine by forceloading the mbcache and ext2 kernel modules, right?
I run Linux on my other systems here; the card would never be put into a Windows system.
Any other issues to consider?
thanks much for any comments...
| The Following User Says Thank You to genome4hire For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2008-03-08
, 18:04
|
|
Posts: 110 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#3
|
|
|
2008-03-08
, 22:42
|
|
Posts: 110 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#4
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to cdmackay For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2008-03-09
, 02:04
|
|
Posts: 110 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#5
|

The advantages of ext2 would be that it can host symlinks, uid/gid, etc, etc.
The downside of ext2 would be that it does't get automounted, but I can work around that, by putting it in /etc/fstab, and I imagine by forceloading the mbcache and ext2 kernel modules, right?
I run Linux on my other systems here; the card would never be put into a Windows system.
Any other issues to consider?
thanks much for any comments...