Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    So. The moon landing. Still think it's hoaxed?

    Reply
    Page 4 of 5 | Prev |   2     3   4   5   | Next
    danramos | # 31 | 2008-08-29, 18:00 | Report

    Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
    The premise was idiotic but I did love that show!
    Space 1999 was a REALLY great show.. and yeah, I think it'd be great to resurrect it.

    According to the canon last updated from the Last Transmission (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UJu0_NSt8Y), the moon was on a trajectory that MIGHT allow it to swing past Earth again in the future and since they DID pass by a seemingly habitable planet, they had to make a decision to either colonize the planet or wait to return to Earth. They decided to stay on the planet and hope that the transmission made it to Earth.

    I would LOVE to see someone take that storyline and run with it as a premise for a movie continuing the story from our perspective decades later as the moon swings past Earth. As it returns, about 20 years later (2019), humanity would arrive on the moon to find all its inhabitants missing and all the ships (Eagles) missing and a decision is made to reoccupy Moon Base Alpha and see if they can find out and report back what ever came of the previous inhabitants and their offspring on the new world if they can arrive there again.

    If done well, even an outrageous premise like the one in Space 1999 can still be a lot of fun. It's fiction, after all.

    ...not like the Apollo moon landings which were definitely non-fiction.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    thoughtfix | # 32 | 2008-08-29, 21:00 | Report

    NASA TOTALLY FAKED the moon landing's importance.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    danramos | # 33 | 2008-08-29, 21:04 | Report

    Originally Posted by thoughtfix View Post
    NASA TOTALLY FAKED the moon landing's importance.
    Right? I wish they had taken it more seriously.. maybe bring back some actual EVIDENCE that they'd been there.. maybe some moon dust.. moon rocks.. SOMETHING.

    ...oh right.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    sgosnell | # 34 | 2008-08-30, 00:44 | Report

    We never went back to the moon because of money. It costs too much, for not enough return. We already have plenty of moon rocks, and there isn't much else up there. Ta-t3 is right. The technology to permit a credible fake simply didn't exist in the 60s. I was in college at the time, and the university had one computer, total. It had its own building, and took up much of it. My N800 has far more computing power than it was capable of. My personal computer was a slide rule. There was no such thing as digital video, just huge tape machines. The computers used punch cards, and the only output was via printer, no monitors. Computer graphics was far in the future. It simply wasn't possible to do any fakes that weren't obvious. People born in the past 20 years or so have no idea how far we've come in the past 40 years. We couldn't have even conceived of the computing power available today, and even with the power of today, it's still not possible to do a convincing fake.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    quad | # 35 | 2008-08-30, 03:38 | Report

    I did read somewhere that the forbidden "area 51" was the actual place where the fake landing was filmed, so we would be able to see the exact sand dunes..

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    ghassane | # 36 | 2008-08-30, 04:09 | Report

    Hi,

    If you have time see these videos (This is part 1 and there are 9, i think):
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUOItuKm5UE

    If you don't have enough time, so this one is enough (Part 5):
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RXrKRuNvNU

    So, is Moon Landing A Fake or Fact?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Texrat | # 37 | 2008-08-30, 04:24 | Report

    Originally Posted by ghassane View Post
    So, is Moon Landing A Fake or Fact?
    Fact. The fake theories have all been thoroughly debunked. Time to move on.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Karel Jansens | # 38 | 2008-08-30, 14:54 | Report

    Originally Posted by sgosnell View Post
    We never went back to the moon because of money. It costs too much, for not enough return. We already have plenty of moon rocks, and there isn't much else up there.
    Helium-3?
    ____

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    tso | # 39 | 2008-08-30, 14:59 | Report

    Originally Posted by Karel Jansens View Post
    Helium-3?
    ____
    thats worth nothing until the brainiacs can crack sustainable fusion...

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Karel Jansens | # 40 | 2008-08-30, 15:22 | Report

    Originally Posted by tso View Post
    thats worth nothing until the brainiacs can crack sustainable fusion...
    Actually, helium-3 fusion is pretty much consumer-ready right now. The problem is that Earth's entire helium-3 supply fits in a Tesla fuel tank.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Page 4 of 5 | Prev |   2     3   4   5   | Next
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout