Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    Java on OS2006?

    Reply
    Page 3 of 4 | Prev |   1     2   3   4   | Next
    =DC= | # 21 | 2006-09-09, 16:16 | Report

    That's odd, it works just fine for me. I hope Google isn't having any problems. Try it again and let me know if it still not working. Thanks.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    aleksandyr | # 22 | 2006-09-09, 20:08 | Report

    http://www.k-embedded-java.com/binaries/mika770.tgz

    Note the /binaries/ --- which differs from the link on their page. =)

    DC: your tgz is a 334 byte HTML error message.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    =DC= | # 23 | 2006-09-09, 20:43 | Report

    Originally Posted by aleksandyr
    http://www.k-embedded-java.com/binaries/mika770.tgz

    Note the /binaries/ --- which differs from the link on their page. =)

    DC: your tgz is a 334 byte HTML error message.
    Thanks aleksandyr, I must have been out of it to miss that. Sorry to everyone for the confusion. Disregard my direct link as well as the one from my Google Pages account.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Odin | # 24 | 2006-09-10, 02:11 | Report

    Originally Posted by =DC=
    That's odd, it works just fine for me. I hope Google isn't having any problems. Try it again and let me know if it still not working. Thanks.
    This link:

    http://derek.a.coleman.googlepages.com

    works fine, but it leads to a confusing place (not really sure what it is):

    "The Complete NET9 Universe"

    Anyway, it may be that file permissions are keeping the archive from downloading. The error message is:

    The requested URL /mika770.tgz was not found on this server.

    This seems to indicate a mapping problem, at least to me.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    anidel | # 25 | 2006-09-19, 13:09 | Report

    It does not work for me on OS2006.

    It says it cannot find the executable even if I'm using the right command
    (mika exec in bin/ and I run "./bin/mika"). Checked the permissions, and they are ok
    (rwxr-xr-x)

    I think it's for OS2005 ?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    aflegg | # 26 | 2006-09-19, 13:15 | Report

    You've not expanded it on the MMC, which is mounted with "noexec"?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    BanditRider | # 27 | 2006-09-20, 02:13 | Report

    Originally Posted by anidel
    It does not work for me on OS2006.

    It says it cannot find the executable even if I'm using the right command
    (mika exec in bin/ and I run "./bin/mika"). Checked the permissions, and they are ok
    (rwxr-xr-x)

    I think it's for OS2005 ?
    drop the leading dot.
    ./bin/mika looks for mika in the bin directory within the current directory ( the . means the current directory )

    /bin/mika looks for mika in the /bin directory.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    anidel | # 28 | 2006-10-02, 08:03 | Report

    I know that, thanks...
    I did expand it in my /usr directory so that the exec is in /usr/bin/mika
    I did try to run it as "mika" only (the TAB completion does see it) but it keeps saying "not found". So I tried to CD to /usr, /usr/bin and run it with the ./ prefixed, still no luck.

    What is wrong ?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    fanoush | # 29 | 2006-10-02, 09:09 | Report

    for those javaphiles who want to try everything there is also EWE

    http://www.ewesoft.com/
    http://fanoush.webpark.cz/maemo/#ewe

    Wonka/mika looks good. But the version available seems to be IT2005 build and there is no source available yet.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    chill633 | # 30 | 2006-11-13, 14:07 | Report

    For those who have high hopes for GPLv2 Java coming to the N770, there is a downside. Jazelle is the ARM Java acceleration that is in the N770, but unused.

    http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS6857451192.html
    Chu adds, "We won't be able to put everything out there [under the GPL]. For example, in our commercial product, we have integration with Jazelle. Obviously, we cannot put that code into open source. So in the open source version, we will take out some of the pieces that have third party IP, that we don't have the right to open source. Whereas with the commercial product, in some cases, we already have some of those commercial relationships in place that allow us to include those pieces."

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Page 3 of 4 | Prev |   1     2   3   4   | Next
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout