Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    The Pandora Cluster Bleep

    Reply
    Page 3 of 7 | Prev |   1     2   3   4     5   | Next | Last
    danramos | # 21 | 2008-12-09, 20:23 | Report

    Originally Posted by fms View Post
    Hehe, I have been an Amiga user and I know that for a lot of hardcore fans the proper lesson takes 2-3 iterations to learn
    These N900 vs Pandora wars are absolutely silly.. and petty! These products aren't even our in anyone's hands yet! Near as I can tell, they sound more and more alike. ...and also we know Atari ST's were better than Amiga. **cough**

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    flareup | # 22 | 2008-12-09, 20:39 | Report

    Originally Posted by Karel Jansens View Post
    It seems the N900 will (might/would?) have only 128 MB of RAM and probably therefore also only 256 MB of NAND. Also, I haven't heard any mention of TV-out for the N900.

    Karel, I asked on another thread but didn't get a reply, probably because the thread dropped off or something.

    I'm usually interested in your posts, and i know you are obviously interested in/a supporter of the Pandora, but do you actually have an *interest* in it, ie in some business sense? I know it's really none of my business, but as someone who checks this forum daily and finds it a great source of both information and entertainment (for many reasons) and i'd dearly like to know,

    cheers!

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    TA-t3 | # 23 | 2008-12-09, 20:49 | Report

    I'm in the funny situation that GBP still keeps going down (but isn't that also true for GBP vs. USD?), so while I'm waiting for the CC setup to come online I'm getting to pay less and less.. 3% less as of today. With luck the change should cover any extra charges I may run into. Whereas, if I had paid via bank transfer the same day as the refund arrived I would have come out even (except for the bank transfer charge, which is a bit large to stomach.. one of the reasons I'm waiting for the CC setup, while the pound keeps dropping.)

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    qole | # 24 | 2008-12-09, 20:57 | Report

    Originally Posted by lardman View Post
    I'm not overly worried about the money (as in whether it's a scam), just that I can see the Pandora moving progressively backwards into the assumed launch date for the "N900" ...
    Wow, this is... shocking! Shocking, I say! Who would have guessed!!!1

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to qole For This Useful Post:
    Bundyo

     
    fms | # 25 | 2008-12-09, 21:02 | Report

    Originally Posted by danramos View Post
    These N900 vs Pandora wars are absolutely silly.. and petty!
    There is no N900 vs Pandora war going on, aside from Karel's personal unhappiness with Nokia not doing exactly what he wants. As far as the product readiness goes though, I have much more faith in Nokia delivering a new tablet than in Pandora folks delivering their device. Simply because Nokia has got ...mmm... a history of delivering mobile devices, including three previous tablet models.

    PS: As to which one is "better" I have no idea, especially considering that neither is available yet. It probably depends on what you want from your device.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fms For This Useful Post:
    Bundyo, penguinbait

     
    Karel Jansens | # 26 | 2008-12-09, 21:23 | Report

    Originally Posted by flareup View Post
    Karel, I asked on another thread but didn't get a reply, probably because the thread dropped off or something.

    I'm usually interested in your posts, and i know you are obviously interested in/a supporter of the Pandora, but do you actually have an *interest* in it, ie in some business sense? I know it's really none of my business, but as someone who checks this forum daily and finds it a great source of both information and entertainment (for many reasons) and i'd dearly like to know,

    cheers!
    I ordered one.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    deeteroderdas | # 27 | 2008-12-09, 21:30 | Report

    Originally Posted by danramos View Post
    ...and also we know Atari ST's were better than Amiga. **cough**
    Well, they both make great boat anchors now

    Actually, my 2000 probably would have been a better one, 'cuz it's bigger.

    Nyah!

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    danramos | # 28 | 2008-12-09, 22:59 | Report

    Originally Posted by deeteroderdas View Post
    Well, they both make great boat anchors now

    Actually, my 2000 probably would have been a better one, 'cuz it's bigger.

    Nyah!
    Wow.. first it was 'the graphics are better' then it was 'the music is better'... and now it's 'it weighs more?' heheh

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    daperl | # 29 | 2008-12-10, 00:31 | Report

    Originally Posted by danramos View Post
    Wow.. first it was 'the graphics are better' then it was 'the music is better'... and now it's 'it weighs more?' heheh
    Then the battery blows up.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Benson | # 30 | 2008-12-10, 01:20 | Report

    Originally Posted by danramos View Post
    These N900 vs Pandora wars are absolutely silly.. and petty! These products aren't even our in anyone's hands yet!
    Well, technically, some early pre-production runs of both devices are in the hands of developers from their respective camps. Alas, the RX-51s are inside Nokia, so only Pandoras are hitting youtube.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Page 3 of 7 | Prev |   1     2   3   4     5   | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout