Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#11
Originally Posted by qole View Post
...with fast enough hardware (or good hardware encoding), and a good enough camera, you could easily have high-quality, live-to-broadcast streaming video...
It's going to depend upon how you define "good enough camera" and "broadcast". A significant percentage of those in broadcasting were aghast when DV footage was allowed on air, and there are still those who refuse to accept HDV as "true" HD. A Nokia handheld is going to be a tough sell in the traditional broadcast or video production markets.

On the other hand, there are others who specifically go for the "YouTube look" when creating web video, and a pocketable, all-in-one device such as that you're envisioning would play well for run-and-gun there. Bill it as a Flip MinoHD with Eye-Fi-like upload and built-in, live streaming.

As a side note, this reminds me the demo GY-DV300U we had on loan from JVC some six or seven years ago. It was too little for too much, but time favorably shifts the price point of technology, and I'd say the idea is coming around again.
__________________
maemo.org profile
 
qole's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 7,109 | Thanked: 8,820 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
#12
I just have no idea of the A/V encoding power of the 35xx chipset, nor just how much bandwidth would be required to stream this, but I think a minimum requirement for what I'm talking about would be 640x480, 25 fps, no obvious compression artifacts. I'm sure the "traditional broadcast or video production markets" would be aghast at those specs, but I really believe those numbers are sufficient for live reporter-on-the-spot type broadcasts.

There are other factors, of course. For example, image stabilization has been a problem on recent Nokia devices. A nice clear video stream is nothing if it looks like the camera is being held by a palsied hamster.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to qole For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#13
From TPS65950 and OMAP3530 Hardware Connectivity User's Guide ( http://focus.ti.com.cn/cn/lit/ug/swcu056a/swcu056a.pdf )

- Image/video/audio (IVA) 2+ accelerator, enabling multistandard (MPEG-4, WMV9, RealVideo®, H263, H264) encoding/decoding at D1 (720 x 480 pixels) 30 frames per second (fps)

So, at least in theory, this should be possible IF the rest of the system can sustain the datarate through the whole camera-gstreamer-encoder-streamserver chain.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post:
qole's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 7,109 | Thanked: 8,820 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
#14
Bah, I can't get flumotion to start on either my Ubuntu desktop machine, or in my tablet's Debian chroot. I'm not sure what's wrong in each case, but it seems that it might have something to do with the SSL certificate I create during the install...

Originally Posted by qole View Post
I'm getting more and more excited as I read about this Flumotion server... Looks pretty straightforward to set up a web cam to stream out to the web...

Makes me wonder if this can be done already using the tablet as the "Video Worker" and a desktop computer as the "Manager," "Muxer Worker," and "Streamer Worker". That might take some of the strain off of the poor little tablet.

 
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#15
Originally Posted by qole View Post
...I really believe those numbers are sufficient for live reporter-on-the-spot type broadcasts.
And a wise man you are: New iPhone Good Enough For The Evening News.
__________________
maemo.org profile
 

The Following User Says Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:08.