|
|
2009-07-25
, 09:51
|
|
|
Posts: 1,137 |
Thanked: 402 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Catalunya
|
#22
|
The iPod is much faster because it has a lower rez screen, better browser (than MicroB), and has a faster and newer processor (I am assuming is it a 2nd Gen?). And it is iPod Touch. Little pet peeve of mine.
|
|
2009-07-25
, 10:47
|
|
Posts: 34 |
Thanked: 20 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
@ Bulgaria
|
#23
|
Where should I place my hands to avoid blocking the WiFi signal? (I looked here, but that didn't help me: http://www.nmacleod.com/nokia/schematics/).

|
|
2009-07-25
, 12:09
|
|
|
Posts: 1,310 |
Thanked: 820 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Irving, TX
|
#24
|
Thank you. Now I understand.
I'm getting values from 86/89 with quality value 7% up to 81/89 and 17% (depending on how I orient the N810). My connection is dropping and when it works, it is very slow.
My wife's iTouch is having no trouble connecting at all and she is standing right beside me. (She even has her back to the access point.) She says her email & browser are working normal (which, when I've used her iTouch, is faster than my N810 ever works).
At home we are connecting to a small, weak access point. (But we wanted one that would be too weak for the neighbors to see easily.)
BTW, this WifiInfo app is great. Very helpful. I am going to try to find one for the iTouch. (Anyone have suggestions?)
If the antenna is that bad, and there is plenty of place to put a better one, why Nokia but such a bad antenna?