Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    First N900 Review

    Reply
    Page 39 of 63 | Prev | 29   37     38   39   40     41   49 | Next | Last
    danramos | # 381 | 2009-08-22, 00:22 | Report

    Originally Posted by quipper8 View Post
    Holy smokes, that is a lot of money. I will want one bad, but will probably have to wait for the price to come down about 9 months before I could justify getting one. Over $1000, yikes!
    I almost guarantee you he took the euro number and converted it to US dollars... and now he decided to think it was euros again without converting. As incredibly expensive as US $780 already is for a tablet, it doesn't need to exaggerated.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    mullf | # 382 | 2009-08-22, 00:23 | Report

    Originally Posted by sachin007 View Post
    There is also a PC- connectivity manager ...

    And the all-important "Crash Reporter".

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to mullf For This Useful Post:
    Texrat

     
    attila77 | # 383 | 2009-08-22, 00:57 | Report

    Originally Posted by Texrat View Post
    That number can't be right...
    Not sure about future products, but around here the N810 did (does ?) cost roughly as much euros as it did dollars. Hopefully that means 550$ and not 780E

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Architengi | # 384 | 2009-08-22, 09:12 | Report

    It is time this Nokia device will bring multi-touch as well.

    Because it is all about usability and user friendly that a device gets traction from the masses...

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    anidel | # 385 | 2009-08-22, 09:39 | Report

    I don't get all this fuss about multi-touch. Yes, it can be exploited to bring some nice features, but I don't see how it is that much mandatory.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to anidel For This Useful Post:
    attila77, benny1967, debernardis, GeneralAntilles, kanishou, lardman, Mara, mrojas, mullf, nwerneck, qwerty12, Texrat, zehjotkah, zerojay

     
    benny1967 | # 386 | 2009-08-22, 09:44 | Report

    Originally Posted by anidel View Post
    I don't get all this fuss about multi-touch. Yes, it can be exploited to bring some nice features, but I don't see how it is that much mandatory.
    especially on a mobile device like a phone: you need to be able to use a phone's features with only one hand. i don't see how this would work with multi-touch.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Architengi | # 387 | 2009-08-22, 09:54 | Report

    Originally Posted by anidel View Post
    I don't get all this fuss about multi-touch. Yes, it can be exploited to bring some nice features, but I don't see how it is that much mandatory.
    Well, from simply easy zooming in ovi maps or in browser to having games with no d-pad, multi-touch is what makes a big difference in usability. I know many people would want to only use mainly the phone capabilities, but also many people want gaming, easy browsing and easy maps navigation.

    Then there are applications on iPhone that ppl want them ported to maemo, but they need also UI re-design if for the multi-touch gestures buttons or scroll bars need to occupy the screen for zooming and other things achieved easily with multi-touch.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    attila77 | # 388 | 2009-08-22, 09:55 | Report

    Originally Posted by anidel View Post
    I don't get all this fuss about multi-touch. Yes, it can be exploited to bring some nice features, but I don't see how it is that much mandatory.
    It's the iPhone lookalike requirement. Anything the iPhone has or does, you need to have, too. It doesn't matter how it fits your platform/applications/hardware. You know, 'everything is better with lasers'.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post:
    benny1967, nowave7, qwerty12

     
    Architengi | # 389 | 2009-08-22, 10:00 | Report

    Originally Posted by attila77 View Post
    It's the iPhone lookalike requirement. Anything the iPhone has or does, you need to have, too. It doesn't matter how it fits your platform/applications/hardware. You know, 'everything is better with lasers'.
    Nokia would put multi-touch but they can't.

    Because it is a patent of Apple. I don't know how Palm Pre got it...

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Gorgon | # 390 | 2009-08-22, 10:02 | Report

    Multi-touch is over rated. Quick, one-handed navigation is my requirement for my device. I spent some time with the Palm Pre and navigation was super easy with one hand with quick thumb gestures to do what I needed to do. I was thoroughly impressed until I opened Google Maps and it required multi touch to zoom. I was actually irritated that I had to use two hands to zoom. I'd rather have faded + and - buttons on the screen for zooming.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Gorgon For This Useful Post:
    benny1967, javispedro, kanishou, lemmyslender, qwerty12

     
    Page 39 of 63 | Prev | 29   37     38   39   40     41   49 | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout