Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
nwerneck's Avatar
Posts: 304 | Thanked: 233 times | Joined on Jul 2009 @ São Paulo, SP, Brasil
#1
Hi. I am trying to install the SDK+, and things seemed to go very well until I tried to build a package, and then that happened:

~/src/mytest/maemopad-2.4$ sb2 dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -d -b
dpkg-buildpackage: set CFLAGS to default value: -g -O2
dpkg-buildpackage: set CPPFLAGS to default value:
dpkg-buildpackage: set LDFLAGS to default value:
dpkg-buildpackage: set FFLAGS to default value: -g -O2
dpkg-buildpackage: set CXXFLAGS to default value: -g -O2
dpkg-buildpackage: source package maemopad
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 2.4
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Maemo Integration <integration@maemo.org>
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture armel
fakeroot debian/rules clean
fakeroot: preload library not found, aborting.
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: fakeroot debian/rules clean gave error exit status 1
~/src/mytest/maemopad-2.4$
The problem seems to be in the installation of fakeroot in scratchbox...


~/src/mytest/maemopad-2.4$ sb2 fakeroot ls
fakeroot: preload library not found, aborting.
Any ideas? :/
 
Posts: 432 | Thanked: 645 times | Joined on Mar 2009
#2
Hi nwerneck,

could you help me with telling me which rootstrap you are using?

Cheers Daniel
 
nwerneck's Avatar
Posts: 304 | Thanked: 233 times | Joined on Jul 2009 @ São Paulo, SP, Brasil
#3
Originally Posted by danielwilms View Post
Hi nwerneck,

could you help me with telling me which rootstrap you are using?

Cheers Daniel
diablo4.1.2_armel, I believe.

One important note: I am working with the SDK+ under a chroot environment, my actual system is AMD64 Debian... Is it impossible to work like this?
 
Andre Klapper's Avatar
Posts: 1,665 | Thanked: 1,649 times | Joined on Jun 2008 @ Praha, Czech Republic
#4
"I believe" is not a very good sentence.
You should know what you try when you want to get help. :-)
__________________
maemo.org Bugmaster
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Andre Klapper For This Useful Post:
nwerneck's Avatar
Posts: 304 | Thanked: 233 times | Joined on Jul 2009 @ São Paulo, SP, Brasil
#5
I believe you have too much free time.
 
Posts: 432 | Thanked: 645 times | Joined on Mar 2009
#6
First of all we don't have too much free time, but the opposite. Sometimes this vague information can cost a lot of time for us, even though for the one who asks it doesn't seem to be important. So Andre is absolutely right, that you have to be precise. If you are not sure then ask to get the information. That's for us easier than searching at the wrong end.

Now to your question:

The Jaunty 64bit packages are available on the garage page of the SDK+ project. They work with diablo out of the box.

Cheers Daniel
 

The Following User Says Thank You to danielwilms For This Useful Post:
Andre Klapper's Avatar
Posts: 1,665 | Thanked: 1,649 times | Joined on Jun 2008 @ Praha, Czech Republic
#7
Originally Posted by nwerneck View Post
I believe you have too much free time.
Daniel answered this already perfectly.
__________________
maemo.org Bugmaster
 
nwerneck's Avatar
Posts: 304 | Thanked: 233 times | Joined on Jul 2009 @ São Paulo, SP, Brasil
#8
No. That was unnecessary. I said "I believe" because I am trying to be humble. I am precisely making it clear that I don't know exactly what I am doing, so you are not supposed to immediately waste your time following that uncertain clue. If I had come here saying "yeah, that's it, that's what I done" when in fact I had not, _then_ you could say I was wasting your time with wrong information. You can't complain about me being clear about what I know.

If someone would start working hard because of me saying "I believe" in something, then here again is someone with too much free time, looking for a horn in a horse's head. I said that only hoping there could be some obvious test I could do, or to find out if that could be some well-known problem. There is no time waste involved in telling someone about a well-known problem. If this is not the case, as it is actually expected from a project under so much development, too bad, I'll just keep hacking the thing.

Suppose the whole SDK+ was broken right now, and the manual was outdated or something else. "I believes" would be good enough to find out about some drastic problem. It was good enough to find out about the 64bit packages... I'll try that to see what happens.

Thank you all for the dedication of your free time.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:35.