Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password
    Poll: Is this on or off-topic?
    Poll Options
    Is this on or off-topic?
    View Poll Results

    Nokia vs. Apple Patent Lawsuits and Countersuits

    Reply
    Page 22 of 31 | Prev | 12   20     21   22   23     24   | Next | Last
    ossipena | # 211 | 2010-01-05, 06:13 | Report

    Originally Posted by Rauha View Post
    -Patent number 6,924,789. UI and hardware related patent about highlighting and choosing items from a graphical options menu. (iPod click wheel) LOL !
    actually this could be true if apple hasn't patented it right:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_7280


    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    naabi | # 212 | 2010-01-05, 06:57 | Report

    First of all I apologize for not browsing through the whole thread, so I might be repeat some of your posts.

    First of all most of the software patents suck. Innovation and most of all amount of investment behind those are minimal compared to e.g. research and development of 3G technology. If you invest millions to something like that, you have every right to be paid from your work. Don't get me wrong, I'm not just blaming Apple here, since every big telecom company has these ******** patents also. Good example is patenting your touch screen buttons getting bigger when pressed.

    My understanding is that Apple has been willing to pay the same royalties to Nokia as others. The problem has been that they are not willing to play with the same rules regarding their patents, i.e. making them available to the rest of telecom field with standardized pricing.

    IMO it's quite clear that Apple is on the payer side here, that's the role of a newcomer.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    c900 | # 213 | 2010-01-05, 08:51 | Report

    I've looked at the lawsuit from another angle. Forgive me for pimping my blog, but you can read the whole thing here.

    Basically I suggest that a part of the legal posturing is designed to get headlines about how Apple doesn't invent everything.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    eikido | # 214 | 2010-01-05, 22:41 | Report

    Good luck to nokia suing Apple in the US with a US court (or a court that is heavily connected to the US).

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by eikido; 2010-01-05 at 22:53.

     
    johnkzin | # 215 | 2010-01-06, 03:04 | Report

    Yes. Because everyone in the US loves Apple, and is blindly biased. There's no way the courts wont take Apple's side. Absolutely. Good call.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Laughing Man | # 216 | 2010-01-06, 03:08 | Report

    Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
    I, for one, hope that Nokia is actually heard. Not because I want Apple punished or Nokia to win; but because as a company, you have to operate within the laws and confinements such as patents rightfully so and it seems like Nokia wasn't trying to go for anything other than "licenses" and Apple is acting rather bullish.
    But didn't Apple just did what Nokia did a few years back to Qualcomm?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    johnkzin | # 217 | 2010-01-06, 03:12 | Report

    Originally Posted by Laughing Man View Post
    But didn't Apple just did what Nokia did a few years back to Qualcomm?
    Yes, and Nokia got spanked for it.

    And if that's exactly what Apple is doing to Nokia now, Apple deserves to be spanked for it ... whether you like Apple or not, and whether you like Nokia or not.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Laughing Man | # 218 | 2010-01-06, 03:14 | Report

    Ah I thought Nokia got away with it. Which is why I was thinking (why on Earth is Nokia suing Apple for doing the same thing they did if they got away with it). Well in that case it does make sense that Nokia is now suing Apple.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    johnkzin | # 219 | 2010-01-06, 03:16 | Report

    Originally Posted by Laughing Man View Post
    Ah I thought Nokia got away with it.
    From what I recall, they had to deal with a long period of import restrictions, and eventually settled with Qualcomm into a mutual agreement, which probably involved back and future royalties.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Rauha | # 220 | 2010-01-06, 03:18 | Report

    Originally Posted by johnkzin View Post
    Yes, and Nokia got spanked for it.
    Wasn't result of Nokia vs. Qualcomm more like win-win. Nokia's license fees to Qualcomm were lowered (Nokia win) but they still pay them (Qualcomm win) and it was setled in a way that doesn't affect any other Qualcomm licensees (big win for both).

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rauha For This Useful Post:
    ossipena, Texrat

     
    Page 22 of 31 | Prev | 12   20     21   22   23     24   | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout