Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
GunnerzMate's Avatar
Posts: 70 | Thanked: 11 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#1
My question is whether or not this is currently relevant in the marketing of devices such as the N900?

Should Nokia have gone with a capacitive touch screen and if so why?

Both touch screen methods have gone a long way so is my question even relevant?

Thanks for your answers. Just wondering...
 
NvyUs's Avatar
Posts: 1,885 | Thanked: 2,008 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ OVI MAPS
#2
boring topic and been debated 100 times already
 

The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to NvyUs For This Useful Post:
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#3
Originally Posted by GunnerzMate View Post
My question is whether or not this is currently relevant in the marketing of devices such as the N900?

Should Nokia have gone with a capacitive touch screen and if so why?

Both touch screen methods have gone a long way so is my question even relevant?

Thanks for your answers. Just wondering...
If you search for capacitive resistive on this forum you'll find not only threads about these topics you'll even find your questions answered by various regulars with know-how, from various angles, because its quite subjective after all.
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to allnameswereout For This Useful Post:
Posts: 219 | Thanked: 98 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
#4
i tried the iPhone last week and focussing on the capacitive screen.

feels like painting a monet with a mop (such a thing to wet-clean the floor with)
 

The Following User Says Thank You to r0eladn For This Useful Post:
Posts: 716 | Thanked: 303 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Sheffield, UK
#5
I find the iPod Touch far too sensitive to touches due to capacitive. While resistive can seem slightly insensitive overall I find that preferable to it picking up me holding the device as a touch, which happens to me all the time on the iPod.

That is doubly so when you use a stylus. Yes you can use a stylus on capacitive but its just as likely to pickup your hand resting on the screen while you try to get a comfortable position to hold the device for using a stylus. Resistive means your fingers can slightly rest on the screen allowing you to hold it easier on one hand while drawing/tapping with the stylus in the other.

Also, grease from your fingers WILL disrupt capacitive sooner or later. I find myself having to wipe the screen too often on the iPod because its stopped responding yet it doesn't look dirty. With resistive it doesn't matter how dirty it is or your hand is, you can still operate it. Not to mention the old "when wearing gloves" argument or "using any implement that exerts pressure".

Last edited by Alex Atkin UK; 2009-10-26 at 21:44.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Alex Atkin UK For This Useful Post:
zehjotkah's Avatar
Posts: 2,361 | Thanked: 3,746 times | Joined on Dec 2007 @ Berlin - Love this city!!
#6
oh no, please not again...
 
Posts: 225 | Thanked: 58 times | Joined on Aug 2009
#7
Close this thread, endless debates that will never end till Nokia develops a multitouch resistive, stylus usable screen...
 
aironeous's Avatar
Posts: 819 | Thanked: 806 times | Joined on Jun 2009 @ Oxnard, Ca.
#8
Nokia just filed a resistive multi-touch patent. Can't remember which gadget or cell phone website i saw that on.
 
aironeous's Avatar
Posts: 819 | Thanked: 806 times | Joined on Jun 2009 @ Oxnard, Ca.
#9
 

The Following User Says Thank You to aironeous For This Useful Post:
mikec's Avatar
Posts: 1,366 | Thanked: 1,185 times | Joined on Jan 2006
#10
The debate should be Finger or Finger AND Stylus

MIke C
 
Reply

Tags
capacative, resistive, touch screen, use the search button


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:23.