Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    Nokia FCC filing reveals more details on next tablet

    Reply
    Page 8 of 15 | Prev |   6     7   8   9     10   | Next | Last
    yakko | # 71 | 2006-11-17, 16:26 | Report

    Originally Posted by maxilogan
    Yes, that would be the more important information to me, since my opinion is that the actual weakness of the 770 is the OS (and it appears it'll be the same on the new tablet). Too much crashes overall (yesterday, just opera running, and it crashed the whole tablet).

    So the only thing worth the change would be the more horsepower, since I do not need the camera, and the OS will be the same (as long as they support both the 770 and the new one)
    A faster processor does not mean it would be more stable with the same OS.



    Originally Posted by lbattraw
    As far as an improved version of the OS, I believe IT2006.2 is what they're going to use (a guess).
    Larry
    While I don't know much about the software changes I can say Tools-->Control Panel-->Device-->About product said OS 2007.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by yakko; 2006-11-17 at 16:29.

     
    aflegg | # 72 | 2006-11-17, 16:32 | Report

    If the device as a whole is smaller, what about the screen itself? Is the bevel just shrunk, or is the screen itself physically smaller?

    Although it's a lovely screen in the 770, I'd prefer it to be bigger so that more useful information could be contained at a readable font size. Not smaller (although the advantages to pocketability are obvious).

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Texrat | # 73 | 2006-11-17, 16:36 | Report

    The device as a whole is a bit larger. Screen is the same size.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    phi | # 74 | 2006-11-17, 16:38 | Report

    so, apparently someone has seen and/or played with it, is it faster? does it have more memory? is flash8 or 9 loaded on it?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    =DC= | # 75 | 2006-11-17, 16:42 | Report

    Originally Posted by Texrat
    No, I KNOW that it can't be rotated a full 180 degrees. I also know that at a certain point of rotation the images are upside down.

    I see, fair enough. It would have made sense to be able to rotate the camera, but oh well. As for images being upside down on rotation, that could be solved using a simple transition of the camera view via hardware/software switch to capture images/video correctly.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    thoughtfix | # 76 | 2006-11-17, 18:06 | Report

    Still no updates on the FCC filings. I wait impatiently.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Texrat | # 77 | 2006-11-17, 20:38 | Report

    Originally Posted by =DC=
    I see, fair enough. It would have made sense to be able to rotate the camera, but oh well. As for images being upside down on rotation, that could be solved using a simple transition of the camera view via hardware/software switch to capture images/video correctly.
    Actually, they ARE being recorded correctly as far as the camera is concerned. If you pretend to be a camera, and pan your view 180 degrees (across the ceiling, etc) you'll be seeing things upside down.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Drewvt | # 78 | 2006-11-17, 20:59 | Report

    Originally Posted by =DC=
    And the more I think about that camera, it really could add another dimension to the whole Open Source, community driven, Nokia backed Internet Tablet equation.
    It does open up a few possibilities. Apart from the commercial appeal and the effect on sales, the camera will probably encourage someone to write a (very very lightweight) image editor for Maemo...because once you've got a few instant pictures, you will want to clean them up a little and make minor adjustments, crop them, etc.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    yakko | # 79 | 2006-11-17, 21:43 | Report

    Originally Posted by phi
    so, apparently someone has seen and/or played with it, is it faster? does it have more memory? is flash8 or 9 loaded on it?
    In my opinion someone hasn't played with it enough.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    maxilogan | # 80 | 2006-11-17, 22:27 | Report

    Originally Posted by yakko
    A faster processor does not mean it would be more stable with the same OS.
    While I don't know much about the software changes I can say Tools-->Control Panel-->Device-->About product said OS 2007.
    I wrote that post too quickly. I didn't want to mean that a faster processor means more stability.

    Just saying that I'd prefer a more stable machine, with less crashes etc. to this totally new one. I do not like the new design too much, nor I care about the camera: if we can install OS2007 I won't go with the new tablet *despite* I would like that little more horsepower that (maybe, at this point) it has, too much cons for me agains that unique pro.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Page 8 of 15 | Prev |   6     7   8   9     10   | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout