Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    Mobile browsers performance

    Reply
    Page 2 of 4 | Prev |   1   2   3     4   | Next
    ddalex | # 11 | 2009-11-04, 12:22 | Report

    I've tested this on a couple of iPhones, got from 44 fps (iPhone 2G, OS 3.1.2) to 87 ! (iPhone 3GS).

    Desktop results around my testing vary from 64 fps on Firefox 3.5.4 and 65 fps on IExplorer 8.0.7600 to 228 fps Chrome 4.0.223 and 250 fps Chrome 3.0.195.27, all on the same Lenovo T61p with Windows 7.

    It's quite impressive for an handheld ARM WebKit device to get better javascript performance than Firefox on a dual core x86 machine. Safari on MacBookPros got from 88 to 98 depending on the exact hardware.

    This shows that impressive performance of Javascript on ARM is possible, and that Safari is better tuned on mobile devices than Mozilla.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to ddalex For This Useful Post:
    YoDude

     
    huntr77 | # 12 | 2009-11-04, 12:33 | Report

    Nokia N95 8Gb. v31.0.015 firmware. Gets around 22-24fps

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    NikiSk | # 13 | 2009-11-04, 12:35 | Report

    On my jailbroken iphone 3G 3.0 it varies from 50 to 70fps.

    On my desktop PC Win7 7100, Google Chrome 3.0.195....- it plays at 250fps rock solid.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Crashdamage | # 14 | 2009-11-04, 12:36 | Report

    HTC G1, Android 1.6, using Steel (webkit). Started slow, finally maxed out at 44-52 fps. I was surprised it did that well.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    tso | # 15 | 2009-11-04, 12:38 | Report

    tear 0.3.5 on N800 (5.2008.43-7) hit 96 once all the bricks where removed.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to tso For This Useful Post:
    Matyas

     
    pinguino89 | # 16 | 2009-11-04, 12:41 | Report

    yea that's impressive i was testing it right now!! have a medium of 90 with a hit to 98!!!!

    WOW!

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to pinguino89 For This Useful Post:
    Matyas

     
    YoDude | # 17 | 2009-11-04, 13:04 | Report

    The best I got on my N810, OS2008 43.7 was 32 fps on a BT connection through 19.2 Kbps GPRS.

    The funny thing is that the best I could get was 29 fps connected on WiFi over a 3Mbps cable modem...

    Go figure.

    And I saw no diff with or without bricks...

    @ tso, what was tear 0.3.5's average performance?


    BTW, IE8 on Win7 @ 64 fps

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by YoDude; 2009-11-04 at 13:07.

     
    Netweaver | # 18 | 2009-11-04, 13:55 | Report

    from the 2 dinosaurs in my pocket :

    Nokia E61, Ozone browser : 15 to 27 fps. Compared to a Hero, a 5 year younger machine, not too bad

    HTC Touch pro (WM 6.5 23xxx series), Iris browser, 10 to 15 fps. : Disappointing ...

    HTC Touch pro (WM 6.5 23xxx series), standard IE, 2 fps.

    Please N900, come quick. I want to get rid of at least one of these dinosaurs

    Unfortunately, as I can only be on Three in the UK (no fixed addres), I'll have to run around (hopefully for a short time) with 3 phones

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    alephito | # 19 | 2009-11-04, 13:56 | Report

    Originally Posted by YoDude View Post
    @ tso, what was tear 0.3.5's average performance?
    On my N810 with Tear, I got 60 FPS average.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    TA-t3 | # 20 | 2009-11-04, 14:03 | Report

    I re-ran the test with my N800/OS2007/330MHz/Opera setup: The speed seems to depend on how many bricks there are left. It starts out at an average of 30 (as reported before), then it steadily increases until there are no bricks left. At that point it hovers between 39 and 41.

    On my desktop the number of bricks don't matter, it's steady at 95 all the time. But then again it doesn't use any CPU either. Presumably it's all limited by the graphics card there.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by TA-t3; 2009-11-04 at 14:16.

     
    Page 2 of 4 | Prev |   1   2   3     4   | Next
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout