|
|
2006-11-03
, 16:12
|
|
|
Posts: 242 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ USA & BharatVarsh ( INDIA - Kerala ).
|
#52
|
I see no reason to upgrade when I am completely stable right now. Especially with all the problems people seem to be complaining about. I love my Nokia 770, but I am sick of being a BETA tester because they refuse to QA this stuff. It's not just the 770 though, I also have a Nokia 6682, while the phone is great, it reboots occaisonally and sometimes its when it rings. Call me cooky, but thats a serious bug, and there is no update, I have the latest software version and they will not be updating it. So I am stuck with a $300 phone that reboots sometimes when people call it.
NOKIA - GET IT TOGETHER!!
|
|
2006-11-03
, 16:51
|
|
Posts: 7 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
|
#53
|
|
|
2006-11-03
, 16:52
|
|
|
Posts: 3,096 |
Thanked: 1,525 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Michigan, USA
|
#54
|
Which is the version of Software that you have on your 6682 ? If you flashed it with the latest Firmware, how did you do it and where did you get the Firmware. ? I searched for the latest Firmware all over but could not find it. Thanks
|
|
2006-11-03
, 18:32
|
|
Posts: 373 |
Thanked: 56 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
@ Ottawa, ON
|
#55
|
Btw. does anyone else have to regularly restart opera because links stop working?
|
|
2006-11-03
, 18:43
|
|
|
Posts: 3,220 |
Thanked: 326 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
|
#56
|
I see no reason to upgrade when I am completely stable right now. Especially with all the problems people seem to be complaining about. I love my Nokia 770, but I am sick of being a BETA tester because they refuse to QA this stuff.
|
|
2006-11-03
, 19:43
|
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#57
|
In fairness to Nokia: that's what Open Source Software is (among other things obviously) about: Release early, release often. If you use OSS, you're a beta-tester. To put it crudely: Live it or leave it.
I'm not saying you shouldn't criticize the quality of the software (in fact, the more critics the better!), but it's no use complaining about the process. If you really can't live with the way OSS is developed and released, then maybe Windows is more your thing.
)
|
|
2006-11-03
, 20:19
|
|
Posts: 356 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ Finland
|
#58
|
|
|
2006-11-03
, 21:04
|
|
Posts: 550 |
Thanked: 110 times |
Joined on Aug 2006
|
#59
|
|
|
2006-11-03
, 21:43
|
|
|
Posts: 3,220 |
Thanked: 326 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
|
#60
|
Yes and no. The problem is that there's still closed source components and things that are not open for the community to change. Nokia is still trying to reach the FOSS-bank with one foot safe on the proprietary side of the river... and I'm afraid that won't work.
You're right that we should accept that short release cycles also mean less testing at Nokia and more bugs for the end user. Thats how it works. If you dont like it, always stay at least one version behind.
BUT: The reason why it works this way (in other FOSS-projects) is that developers expect users to file bugs, submit patches and improve the overall quality of the software. This is the reason for "Release early, release often". Now: How should the community fix a bug in a closed source browser? That won't work.
So I think that while the typical Windows-type consumer should probably learn not to install fresh versions immediately, Nokia on the other hand must begin to realize that they can't go on with this strange mixture of open/closed source. If they do, I would strongly support either a completely community driven fork of maemo or adapting some other distribution to the 770 hardware.
(Pity the current Mameo software, while having its bugs, is much too good for people to feel the urge of starting the whole thing from scratch)
--
Does life seem worthwhile to you?