Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 1,141 | Thanked: 781 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Magical Unicorn Land
#1
Hi, sftp/scp speed for me is very very slow. About 150kb/sec. Way too slow to use for copying files over wifi (bluetooth is faster!)

Using same wifi connection on my N95 and SymSMB demo I got several times faster speed copying to it as a samba share from PC, 500kb/sec+.

What speed does everyone else get? Any better way to manage files over wifi?
 
Posts: 355 | Thanked: 566 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Redstone Canyon, Colorado
#2
I use scp over wifi and get 500 to 900k/sec.
 
jkq's Avatar
Posts: 251 | Thanked: 131 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ USA
#3
Originally Posted by jebba View Post
I use scp over wifi and get 500 to 900k/sec.
I've seen up to 1.8MBytes/s before, but generally I also get around the same as jebba.

-jkq
__________________
Class .. : Quiet One
Humor .. : [*********-] Alignment: Chaotic Good
Patience : [******----] Weapon(s): Python scripts
Agro ... : [***-------] Relic(s) : N900

Last edited by jkq; 2009-12-30 at 20:27. Reason: MB -> MBytes
 
Posts: 1,141 | Thanked: 781 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Magical Unicorn Land
#4
It is really disappointing and slow to the point of being useless. Even a plain http transfer from a server on the local network hits max around 750k/s and even that is not consistent. Multiple runs of a 3MB file go as slow as 150k/s.

It's like N900 is trying its hardest to prevent us from using the 32gb of storage.
 
Posts: 1,141 | Thanked: 781 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Magical Unicorn Land
#5
Just tried FTP... same thing, about 750k/s max downloading data into the N900 from a local machine. :-/
 
SubCore's Avatar
Posts: 850 | Thanked: 626 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Vienna, Austria
#6
Originally Posted by stlpaul View Post
It's like N900 is trying its hardest to prevent us from using the 32gb of storage.
speak for yourself

i easily get 1-2 MByte/s over my wlan using scp, seems like something's wrong with your device or configuration.

edit2:
upon further testing, transfers using scp seem to middle out at 1,2-1,4 MByte/s for larger files (>10 MB).
significantly less for many small files, which is to be expected.

i never gave it much thought, it surely "feels" more than fast enough
__________________
"What we perceive is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning."
-- Werner Karl Heisenberg

Last edited by SubCore; 2009-12-31 at 00:38.
 
Posts: 1,141 | Thanked: 781 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Magical Unicorn Land
#7
1-2Mbit/sec is even slower than the speed I'm getting. I'm talking about 750 kbyte not kbit.
 
Posts: 271 | Thanked: 220 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#8
Originally Posted by SubCore View Post
speak for yourself

i easily get 1-2 Mbit/s over my wlan using scp, seems like something's wrong with your device or configuration.
Mbit/s or MByte/s ? 1-2 Mbit/s is pretty pathetic over wifi. To prevent confusion, I would suggest everyone explicitly spell out the bits or bytes they are talking about rather than abbreviating.
 
SubCore's Avatar
Posts: 850 | Thanked: 626 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Vienna, Austria
#9
Originally Posted by texaslabrat View Post
Mbit/s or MByte/s ? 1-2 Mbit/s is pretty pathetic over wifi. To prevent confusion, I would suggest everyone explicitly spell out the bits or bytes they are talking about rather than abbreviating.
i meant MByte/s of course, sorry.
yeah abbreviations are killer... stlpaul wrote "kb" which is bit, i must've gotten confused
__________________
"What we perceive is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning."
-- Werner Karl Heisenberg
 
Posts: 87 | Thanked: 40 times | Joined on May 2007
#10
Use some protocol without encryption (FTP, HTTP, rsync, ... ?) and you probably will have a much better speed, Encryption wastes CPU power so much... and wi-fi usually haves it's own encryption enabled and I doubt all your files are so sensitive that you need to double-encrypt them at the cost of speed.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:35.