|
|
2010-02-18
, 11:13
|
|
Posts: 74 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ athens/greece
|
#32
|
I think a lot of people posting on this topic are missing the point of the author. Yes we are grateful for the openess of the device, we are looking forward to the fantastic opportunities MeeGo will bring but this is more about the "now" and the next 12 months.
N900 for me was a device that needs a lot of TLC from the community to push it to the limits. I knew it wouldnt be the final installment of Maemo and it would be replaced eventually *key word*.
There is a real cycle in product development. Imagine if Apple released 3G and then 4 months later replaced 3GS - not only is that unfair to the consumers who are now tied into the 2 year contract, it reveals a lot about the culture of the firm. Unfortunately If (big if) MeeGoo and the grounds it operates on are not compatible with N900 (and the apps etc developed for it) then the N900 really would have been a very short lived device. Ofcourse many of us will continue to use the N900 and its brilliant power for years to come - but the author I believe is aiming to address the anxiety and frustration of the new users who are accustomed to the 18/24Month device cycle. They wanted the latest device - they got it - and now they're told it's *potentially* not future proof.
In reply to another user, a windows machine running 3.1 would not be upgraded to XP. That's just a silly analogy. This is a better one: A Windows Millenium User expecting an upgrade to XP after the pathetic performance of Millenium. That's a fair expectation.
Same way MS won't sell Windows 7 and 6 months later cause uncertainty and haze to it's consumers by telling them Windows will no longer be their OS of choice. Just imagine what that would entail.

|
|
2010-02-18
, 12:12
|
|
Posts: 86 |
Thanked: 52 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#33
|
N900 for me was a device that needs a lot of TLC from the community to push it to the limits. I knew it wouldnt be the final installment of Maemo and it would be replaced eventually *key word*.
There is a real cycle in product development. Imagine if Apple released 3G and then 4 months later replaced 3GS - not only is that unfair to the consumers who are now tied into the 2 year contract, it reveals a lot about the culture of the firm. Unfortunately If (big if) MeeGoo and the grounds it operates on are not compatible with N900 (and the apps etc developed for it) then the N900 really would have been a very short lived device. Ofcourse many of us will continue to use the N900 and its brilliant power for years to come - but the author I believe is aiming to address the anxiety and frustration of the new users who are accustomed to the 18/24Month device cycle. They wanted the latest device - they got it - and now they're told it's *potentially* not future proof.
In reply to another user, a windows machine running 3.1 would not be upgraded to XP. That's just a silly analogy. This is a better one: A Windows Millenium User expecting an upgrade to XP after the pathetic performance of Millenium. That's a fair expectation.
Same way MS won't sell Windows 7 and 6 months later cause uncertainty and haze to it's consumers by telling them Windows will no longer be their OS of choice. Just imagine what that would entail.