PCSX-m - Page 30 - maemo.org

fms | # 291 | 2010-03-26, 11:28 | Report

Originally Posted by smoku View Post

I guess everyone moved to psx4all.

Which I wouldn't call a bad thing, given the quality of past comments in this thread...

smoku | # 292 | 2010-03-26, 11:42 | Report

What do you mean?
Does quality of the comments affect the software itself?

CaSPeRFXX | # 293 | 2010-04-07, 11:27 | Report

i need help on pcsx i load game and works for five seconds and goes to a black screen can you help me i dont now whats wrong do i need to change settings please help

matthewbpt | # 294 | 2010-04-07, 16:54 | Report

Am I the only one who sees the last picture on the first post as porn... wtf

BillyTheFish | # 295 | 2010-04-08, 16:00 | Report

Originally Posted by matthewbpt View Post

Am I the only one who sees the last picture on the first post as porn... wtf

I don't see that. Why does everyone seem to be using PSX4ALL over PCSX-m? I thought PCSX-m was the one that was going to have development continued? Or did I get that wrong?

nax3000 | # 296 | 2010-04-08, 16:06 | Report

Originally Posted by BillyTheFish View Post

I don't see that. Why does everyone seem to be using PSX4ALL over PCSX-m? I thought PCSX-m was the one that was going to have development continued? Or did I get that wrong?

PSX4ALL is way faster (if less compatible with games). It seems to have a lot more potential than PCSX.
________
Amateur pregnant

Last edited by nax3000; 2011-03-18 at 12:46.

BillyTheFish | # 297 | 2010-04-08, 17:05 | Report

Originally Posted by nax3000 View Post

PSX4ALL is way faster (if less compatible with games). It seems to have a lot more potential than PCSX.

I don't know, maybe I'm reading this wrongly but aren't both by smoku?

Doesn't he say here that psx4all is a no go: http://tomasz.sterna.tv/2010/03/pcsx-for-maemo/

and that PCSX-m is the future?

nax3000 | # 298 | 2010-04-08, 18:47 | Report

Originally Posted by BillyTheFish View Post

I don't know, maybe I'm reading this wrongly but aren't both by smoku?

Doesn't he say here that psx4all is a no go: http://tomasz.sterna.tv/2010/03/pcsx-for-maemo/

and that PCSX-m is the future?

1. Yes they are
2. Yes he did. A while back. I don't know whats his stance on this subject now. Maybe you should ask him

________
Make A Vaporizer

Last edited by nax3000; 2011-03-18 at 12:46.

The Following User Says Thank You to nax3000 For This Useful Post:
BillyTheFish

smoku | # 299 | 2010-04-08, 19:52 | Report

I started PSX4All thread with "As I have it already ported I see no reason in keeping it in my git repository only" statement.

As you would see on http://github.com/smokku timeline I am working both on PSX4All Maemo UI and PCSX-m DynaRec. Whatever I feel like the day.

Until I write/port ARM DynaRec for PCSX-m there is no way it reaches PSX4All performance.

The Following User Says Thank You to smoku For This Useful Post:
BillyTheFish

BillyTheFish | # 300 | 2010-04-08, 20:53 | Report

Originally Posted by nax3000 View Post

2. Yes he did. A while back. I don't know whats his stance on this subject now. Maybe you should ask him

yes, maybe I should have from the start!

Originally Posted by smoku View Post

As you would see on http://github.com/smokku timeline I am working both on PSX4All Maemo UI and PCSX-m DynaRec. Whatever I feel like the day.

Until I write/port ARM DynaRec for PCSX-m there is no way it reaches PSX4All performance.

Fair enough and thanks for replying! That's great to know though so I'll try PSX4All Maemo UI for now and look forward to PCSX-m when you get round to porting ARM DynaRec.

...actually, I might try OCing my N900 and try PCSX-m anyway

.