|
|
2010-03-30
, 04:57
|
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#12
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-03-30
, 14:09
|
|
Posts: 692 |
Thanked: 264 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#13
|
I read this too...I was like...what?! so how's my n900 playing music while I surf? F-ing engadget trying to spin a fast one to favor MS and Iphone... A pause feature...LMAO...
|
|
2010-03-30
, 14:48
|
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#14
|
http://www.engadget.com
has funding from apple. mmooree brainwashing. how can it be a myth lol WDFFFF
Multitasking to expedite the time to switch between non active\idle applications is an unnecessary resource hog (ram, swap file, cpu) if you can figure out a way to launch/close the apps in a similar amount of time;
'True' use of multitasking (in the mobile context), imho, is to run a service that needs to maintain background connection: downloader, streaming media, navigation system, continuous calculation, etc.
A big difference between the necessity to implement multitasking on a desktop system and a mobile one is in their screen size. When you can only display one (optimized) application at a time, then you lose the requirement of looking at 2 (or more) apps running together side by side.
Class .. : Power User
Humor .. : [#####-----] | Alignment: Pragmatist
Patience : [###-------] | Weapon(s): Galaxy Note + BB Bold Touch 9900
Agro ... : [###-------] | Relic(s) : iPhone 4S, Atrix, Milestone, N900, N800, N95, HTC G1, Treos, Zauri, BB 9000, BB 9700, etc