Active Topics

 


Poll: how do you describe multiple forums?
Poll Options
how do you describe multiple forums?

Reply
Thread Tools
Sopwith's Avatar
Posts: 337 | Thanked: 283 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ NYC
#11
Originally Posted by YoDude View Post
New word... Forucopia.

"Forums" is natural for american english speakers...
The vast majority of "american english speakers" had likely never heard the word "forum" before it became popular on the internet.
__________________
In anticipation of TMO's obsolescence, and hoping to meet you all again: elsewhere on the interwebs, I am Dr Doppio.
 
lcuk's Avatar
Posts: 1,635 | Thanked: 1,816 times | Joined on Apr 2008 @ Manchester, England
#12
to throw a spanner into the works, tracy says:
its none of those options, its forii

her logic behind that - its like virus/virii
now, i have to sorta agree with her, since shes the boss in our house.

__________________
liqbase sketching the future.
like what i say? hit the Thanks, thanks!
twitter.com/lcuk
 
YoDude's Avatar
Posts: 2,869 | Thanked: 1,784 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Po' Bo'. PA
#13
Originally Posted by Sopwith View Post
The vast majority of "american english speakers" had likely never heard the word "forum" before it became popular on the internet.
Not true.

I was an avid reader of the "Letter of the Month" in Penthouse Forum magazine when I was but a bald faced boy of 14.

Originally Posted by Penthouse Forum
Since I married young, my husband Craig was the first lover I ever had, and I had always wondered how he stacked up against other men in physical appearance, as well as in lovemaking ability. But I never actually though of satisfying my curiosity until recently. When I did, I ended up being both pleased and disappointed.

About a year ago I attended my high-school class reunion, where I encountered Dave, an old friend of mine from those days, and after we talked for a while I decided that if I wanted to find out what it would be like with another man, he would be a good choice.

Dave and I lived in different cities, but over the months we talked many times by phone and via e-mail, innocently but with increasing intimacy. Finally it got to the point where we agreed to meet at a hotel midway between our two towns.

I was very nervous and excited, and my hormones seemed to be going wild as I approached the meeting place. Dave was waiting for me when I got there, and seemed very happy to see me. He took me up to the room he had rented. He was very courteous and didn't push anything, and we just talked for a while. But at that point I was at least as anxious as he was, and finally I lay down across the bed. He moved to me and kissed me, and in the middle of the kiss I felt his hands on my... (NSFTMO)

Long before I knew of this "internet" you speak of.
__________________

SLN member # 009

Last edited by YoDude; 2010-04-02 at 22:21.
 
Posts: 11 | Thanked: 4 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#14
Originally Posted by lcuk View Post
to throw a spanner into the works, tracy says:
its none of those options, its forii

her logic behind that - its like virus/virii
now, i have to sorta agree with her, since shes the boss in our house.
Your wife is right with with virus/virii. But it is a different thing with forum/fora. As virus is maskulin but forum is neutrum.
 
lcuk's Avatar
Posts: 1,635 | Thanked: 1,816 times | Joined on Apr 2008 @ Manchester, England
#15
she knows its wrong, just being 'argumentative'
__________________
liqbase sketching the future.
like what i say? hit the Thanks, thanks!
twitter.com/lcuk
 
Posts: 889 | Thanked: 537 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ scotland
#16
actually i believe if u consider the ramifications of conjugating the past-present and possible nevertense the answer is FORMICA. :P
__________________
sarcasm may be the lowest form of wit, but its the only wit i have.

its a sad day when i can't slip at least one hitchhiker reference in somewhere.
 
Posts: 5,795 | Thanked: 3,151 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Agoura Hills Calif
#17
forums sounds best, and that is just fine as a criteria
 
Posts: 336 | Thanked: 610 times | Joined on Apr 2008 @ France
#18
With regards to fora, it's wrong. It is a spurious argument to claim that a loan word should follow the rules of the language it comes from. How many people know the Inuit pluralisation rules for 'anorak', or the Nahautl rules for 'avocado'. If we borrow a Japanese word, can't we make it plural because Japanes has no plural? Where should we draw the line? Japanese does not accept an inanimate noun as a subject; should we follow this rule, too?

Use "fora" if it makes your day better, but don't tell people that it is more or less wrong than "forums".

With regards to virii, that is an absolute abomination and needs to be completely killed.

Writers who, searching for a fancy plural to virus, incorrectly write *viri are doubtless blindly applying an overreaching -us => -i rule. This mis-inflects many words. For example, status and hiatus only change the length of the final vowel; genus goes to genera; corpus goes to corpora. Others are even worse if this rule is mis-applied, like syllabus, caucus, octopus, mandamus, and rebus.

Anyway, Latin already had a word viri, but it was the nominative plural not of virus (slime, poison, or venom), but of vir (man), which as it turns out is also a 2nd declension noun. I do not believe that writers of English who write viri are intentionally speaking of men. And although there actually is a viri form for virus, it's the genitive singular[1], not the nominative plural. And we certainly don't grab for genitive singulars for the plurals when we've started out with a nominative. Such hanky panky would certainly get you talked about, and probably your hand slapped as well.
It goes even further:

Those confused souls who write *virii are tacitly positing the existence of the non-word *virius, and declining it as though it were like filius. It's true that l/r are both linguals that sometimes get interchanged, and that f/v are just a change in voicing[2], but that's just reaching. *Virii is still completely silly, so don't do that; otherwise, everyone will know you're just a blathering script kiddie.

The crucial problem here is that, classically speaking, there appears to be no recorded use of virus in the plural. It was a 2nd declension noun ending in -us, which is rather common, but it was also a neuter, which is rather rare. I could only come up with three such 2nd declension neuters: virus (some poison), pelagus (the sea, usually poetically), and vulgus (the crowd). None appear to admit plurals. Perhaps this is because they are mass nouns, not count nouns. [3]
Source
 
Sopwith's Avatar
Posts: 337 | Thanked: 283 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ NYC
#19
Originally Posted by YoDude View Post
Not true.

I was an avid reader of the "Letter of the Month" in Penthouse Forum magazine when I was but a bald faced boy of 14.




Long before I knew of this "internet" you speak of.
Sure, but I wouldn't expect anyone who describes himself as a keen reader to be representative of the majority of any nation. People who enjoy reading will always be a minority.

Other than that, cool story Somehow, it made me suddenly realize what people intend to use an iPad for... and it isn't reading
__________________
In anticipation of TMO's obsolescence, and hoping to meet you all again: elsewhere on the interwebs, I am Dr Doppio.
 
YoDude's Avatar
Posts: 2,869 | Thanked: 1,784 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Po' Bo'. PA
#20
Originally Posted by Sopwith View Post
Sure, but I wouldn't expect anyone who describes himself as a keen reader to be representative of the majority of any nation. People who enjoy reading will always be a minority...
...that's pro'ly why that magazine has so many pictures.

Originally Posted by Sopwith View Post

...Other than that, cool story Somehow, it made me suddenly realize what people intend to use an iPad for... and it isn't reading
...and perhaps another reason why the iPad needs a good "screen protector"
__________________

SLN member # 009

Last edited by YoDude; 2010-04-04 at 15:15.
 
Reply

Tags
forums or flora?


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:33.