|
|
2010-12-06
, 19:19
|
|
Posts: 147 |
Thanked: 472 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#841
|
|
|
2010-12-06
, 19:25
|
|
|
Posts: 257 |
Thanked: 205 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Sydney, Australia
|
#842
|
|
|
2010-12-06
, 19:47
|
|
Posts: 291 |
Thanked: 313 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ France
|
#843
|
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to dtergens For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-12-06
, 21:40
|
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#844
|
QT works well for a lot of apps but there are certain classes of apps where QT doesn't really lighten the load all that much. Especially with any custom UI, there are a lot of little platform-specific quirks, which is a problem we're very familiar with. On the back-end, things like realtime processing (necessary for filling the audio buffer) or working with the filesystem are fundamentally not helped by QT.
We're definitely not pulling the app altogether. When MeeGo is ready we'd like to be a part of that. In the mean time, we'll also be launching on Android, Mac, Windows and Linux all in the immediate future.
|
|
2010-12-06
, 22:10
|
|
Posts: 147 |
Thanked: 472 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#845
|
I not sure I follow the story, there must be some miscommunication going on here. Unless the question is about using a GTK+ specific-solution for commercial purposes, or requiring something from Extras, everything you do on Maemo is very much applicable on Nokia's next MeeGo devices.
PS. Note - abstracting filesystem access/operations is within Qt's scope (see QFile, QIODevice, etc)
|
|
2010-12-06
, 22:11
|
|
Posts: 277 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#846
|
Last week we spoke with Nokia. We were actively discouraged from developing for Maemo any further.
|
|
2010-12-06
, 22:29
|
|
Posts: 147 |
Thanked: 472 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#847
|
Shouldn't Nokia instead by guiding you through a transition - for example in terms of doing as much as possible that can work across Symbian/maemo/meego - for example in the Qt APIs so that the actual platform becomes less of an issue
I worry Nokia's going to loose some of the maemo community the way they're going, especially with the growth of android.
Speaking as a user (developer on other systems but not mobile)
| The Following User Says Thank You to peter@instinctiv.com For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-12-06
, 23:11
|
|
Posts: 575 |
Thanked: 621 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#848
|
As MeeGo evolves we'll continue to keep a close eye on it. However, unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, we'll probably wait and see what kind of distribution it gets before committing development resources to MeeGo.
| The Following User Says Thank You to clovis86 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-12-06
, 23:19
|
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#849
|
Shouldn't Nokia instead by guiding you through a transition - for example in terms of doing as much as possible that can work across Symbian/maemo/meego - for example in the Qt APIs so that the actual platform becomes less of an issue
| The Following User Says Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-12-06
, 23:21
|
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#850
|