|
|
2010-07-09
, 04:42
|
|
Posts: 137 |
Thanked: 34 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ United States
|
#81
|
|
|
2010-07-09
, 04:58
|
|
Posts: 12 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Espoo, Finland
|
#82
|
|
|
2010-07-09
, 05:00
|
|
Posts: 257 |
Thanked: 51 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#83
|
So after reading these articles and viewing these comparison pictures I am starting to feel disappointed and ticked off because the n900 is supposed to be the best that Nokia can offer and yet its has **** for hardware.
All the other smart phones have 512mb ram
We get just 256
Our screens dont have retina or amoled technologies
We dont get HDMI out or wireless dlna but just generic VGA
Many other smartphones get wireless n speeds of 200mbps
we get just 54mbps
Many other smartphones have 1280x760 video resolution @ 30fps
we have a lousy 800x400 resolution @ 20~fps
Other smartphones are sleek, sharp and light,
Our phones are bricks and heavy
Other smartphones get better battery's and better battery life.
We get virtually the worst battery life of all smart phones
Other smartphone's graphics chip push almost 30 gpu triangles/s
Our phones graphics chip pushs just 14 gpu triangles/s
Please discuss ! thanks
http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets...stats_v2.0.jpg
http://alienbabeltech.com/main/?p=17125
http://alienbabeltech.com/main/wp-co...recompari1.png
|
|
2010-07-09
, 05:51
|
|
Posts: 992 |
Thanked: 738 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Low Earth Orbit
|
#84
|
Just to update, Ubuntu has now been ported to the Nexus One. Still experimental, but the biggest hurdle has been passed.
So the OP does have some credability regarding N900's short-comings and that the competitors now have "better" software.
|
|
2010-07-09
, 06:00
|
|
Posts: 992 |
Thanked: 738 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Low Earth Orbit
|
#85
|
|
|
2010-07-09
, 18:15
|
|
Posts: 59 |
Thanked: 8 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ UK
|
#87
|