|
|
2010-08-29
, 10:46
|
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#22
|
|
|
2010-08-29
, 11:11
|
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#23
|
In simpler terms, to avoid further confusion; what will be supported going forward? Qt? Great. Why hadn't Qt been backported to Maemo 4.1? Laziness? Lack of demand? Who knows, but it wasn't (not 4.6 or higher).
Indeed. Now, how will Nokia assist developers currently in that shift? And above all, how many current GTK apps are being transferred to Qt that are known... and what are their expected delivery dates? That's currently unknown. Address that.
| The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-08-29
, 13:22
|
|
|
Posts: 1,012 |
Thanked: 817 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ France
|
#24
|
The other thing is - why are people so hung up on rewrites and ports ? Sure, if the authors say they want to learn Qt, rewrite their project in it
|
|
2010-08-29
, 14:09
|
|
|
Posts: 1,635 |
Thanked: 1,816 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ Manchester, England
|
#25
|
@lcuk - What, exactly, is so bad about Fremantle that you seem to feel it a foolhardy endeavor to continue? Really, I'm curious?
In that one sentence you have pretty much summed up exactly why the bitterness exists. You aggrandize Maemo in your first post, then you call it a dead end. Why is there such an eagerness to drop it?
I am relatively new to Maemo, I am not new to programming. I like Maemo, I ~might~ like MeeGo, but if I have to encounter such rhetoric as this, I may well just take my skillset elsewhere.
| The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to lcuk For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-08-29
, 14:44
|
|
|
Posts: 4,783 |
Thanked: 1,253 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
@ norway
|
#26
|
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to tso For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-08-29
, 22:04
|
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#27
|
The other thing is - why are people so hung up on rewrites and ports? Sure, if the authors say they want to learn Qt, rewrite their project in it, cool, they will certainly get help, everybody happy (though I don't fully understand what delivery dates are you talking about in the context of community projects).
|
|
2010-08-29
, 22:28
|
|
|
Posts: 794 |
Thanked: 784 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ /Canada/Ontario/GTA
|
#28
|
|
|
2010-08-29
, 22:37
|
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#29
|
My question that you're overlooking repeatedly is this: Where is the list of apps out of your top 5 or otherwise that will be translated from GTK to Qt and their deliverable dates?
|
|
2010-08-29
, 23:34
|
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#30
|
My question is why you're badgering lcuk for an answer he can't possibly have.
I mean, I understand that you're pessimistic but damn, some people are trying to put forth -some- effort towards future progress. If Nokia et. al. are as bad as you say, they won't need your help in deterring people.
On handsets the situation is different. MeeGo will have to compete with Android, MS and Symbian.