Active Topics
-
How many of you still use N900 as main phone? (595)
to Community by deutch1976 - 23 hrs, 30 mins ago -
Big news (7)
to OS2008 / Maemo 4 / Chinook - Diablo by endsormeans - 2 days, 8 hrs ago -
Firefox with Leste (8)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by endsormeans - 2 days, 8 hrs ago -
Which is the best N95? What software modifications could be made to it? (3)
to General by Kalatti - 5 days, 8 hrs ago -
Installing CSSU Stable in year 2024 (2)
to Maemo 5 / Fremantle by teroyk - 5 days, 16 hrs ago -
Porting apps to Leste (34)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Arno_11 - 6 days, 2 hrs ago - more...
 |
|
2010-12-30
, 12:14
|
|
Posts: 566 |
Thanked: 282 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Lower Saxony
|
#2
|
N900 does not have IrDA. The IR port can only send, not receive.
File transfers are not possible.
Last edited by casketizer; 2010-12-30 at 12:17.
File transfers are not possible.
Last edited by casketizer; 2010-12-30 at 12:17.
 |
|
2010-12-30
, 12:26
|
|
Posts: 752 |
Thanked: 284 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Malaysia
|
#3
|
What???
I checked our manual (page 15)
So, do we have any application for the IrDA?
I checked our manual (page 15)
None of the pre-installed applications of your device use the infrared port, but it enables the development of third party applications requiring an infrared port. The infrared port is not IrDA compatible.
|
|
2010-12-30
, 12:39
|
|
Posts: 114 |
Thanked: 109 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
@ Finland
|
#4
|
Irreco is a remote control software which uses IrDA.
By the way, is it possible to build an app to send files over IrDA, not to receive?
By the way, is it possible to build an app to send files over IrDA, not to receive?
|
|
2010-12-30
, 12:53
|
|
Posts: 566 |
Thanked: 282 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Lower Saxony
|
#5
|
Again. The IR port of the N900 IS NOT AN IrDA PORT.
IrDA requires two way communication, as do file transfers in any direction.
The only thing that can be done with N900's IR port is stuff like IrReCo...
IrDA requires two way communication, as do file transfers in any direction.
The only thing that can be done with N900's IR port is stuff like IrReCo...
 |
|
2010-12-30
, 12:53
|
|
Posts: 466 |
Thanked: 180 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#6
|
@kenraali The problem is that we only have the ir emitter and not a receiver.
This means, in a developer perspective:
1) we cant comply the irda file transfer standard (because we need the receiver too), so you need to develop a custom irda protocol, from the emitter part (n900) and the receiver part (the PC? what device are you trying to communicate with? you need to develop the custom receiver software for each one)
2) you can't verify the data that you are sending. If you are sending a 2mb file, you really cant know if the file gone corrupt in the transfer operation.
This means, in a developer perspective:
1) we cant comply the irda file transfer standard (because we need the receiver too), so you need to develop a custom irda protocol, from the emitter part (n900) and the receiver part (the PC? what device are you trying to communicate with? you need to develop the custom receiver software for each one)
2) you can't verify the data that you are sending. If you are sending a 2mb file, you really cant know if the file gone corrupt in the transfer operation.
| The Following User Says Thank You to clasificado For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-12-30
, 12:56
|
|
Posts: 752 |
Thanked: 284 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Malaysia
|
#7
|
Originally Posted by clasificado
I can't imagine why Nokia would put the Ir emitter and not a receiver. What could we use it for? Any advantage?
@kenraali The problem is that we only have the ir emitter and not a receiver.
This means, in a developer perspective:
1) we cant comply the irda file transfer standard (because we need the receiver too), so you need to develop a custom irda protocol, from the emitter part (n900) and the receiver part (the PC? what device are you trying to communicate with? you need to develop the custom receiver software for each one)
2) you can't verify the data that you are sending. If you are sending a 2mb file, you really cant know if the file gone corrupt in the transfer operation.
|
|
2010-12-30
, 13:01
|
|
Posts: 566 |
Thanked: 282 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Lower Saxony
|
#8
|
cheaper for them. And almost noone uses IrDA anymore.
|
|
2010-12-30
, 13:07
|
|
Posts: 752 |
Thanked: 284 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Malaysia
|
#9
|
Originally Posted by casketizer
Cheaper for them than what?
cheaper for them. And almost noone uses IrDA anymore.
|
|
2010-12-30
, 13:17
|
|
Posts: 566 |
Thanked: 282 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Lower Saxony
|
#10
|
A real IrDA compliant IR port with emitter and receiver.
The IR diode they used only costs them a few cents.
The IR diode they used only costs them a few cents.
Seems we only have options:
Send via Bluetooth
Share via service(which is fMMS)
Send via E-mail
Is there an application we need to install to enable file transfer via irDA?