Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    Rumor: N9 to have 1.2Ghz Atom

    Reply
    Page 6 of 15 | Prev |   4     5   6   7     8   | Next | Last
    Netweaver | # 51 | 2011-01-20, 21:35 | Report

    nCDK is certainly an intel Medfield based handset, as per details in this bug report :

    http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-15789

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    mikecomputing | # 52 | 2011-01-20, 21:39 | Report

    Originally Posted by Netweaver View Post
    nCDK is certainly an intel Medfield based handset, as per details in this bug report :

    http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-15789
    THAT we already know see qa report. But more intresting is if its N9 :-P

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    mrojas | # 53 | 2011-01-20, 21:50 | Report

    Anyone remembers this?



    I bet that the first MeeGo tablet will run in x86. It will make sense, since the form factor allows a bigger battery, and Intel seems to have been testing some MeeGo UI for tablets already (http://mynokiablog.com/2010/06/01/new-meego-tablet-ui/).

    Every piece of know-how they get through this tablet can then easily go towards a x86 phone (if they eventually decide to make one); which could arrive in H2 2011 (fitting the schedules mentioned before).

    If the N9 is going to be launched anytime soon; then the hardware should be decided already and getting ready to be mass produced.

    (Credits to MyNokiaBlog for the picture)

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to mrojas For This Useful Post:
    c0rt3x, cjp, kevloral, Netweaver, NvyUs

     
    kingoddball | # 54 | 2011-01-20, 21:54 | Report

    Lies.......

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Creamy Goodness | # 55 | 2011-01-20, 22:08 | Report

    ncdk is a handest. its at the link i posted earlier running handest tests and getting bug reports to do with calls and SMS. they have 3 revisions listed (EB1 EB2 EB3). It has to be close to final by now. I even gave you the screen size and keyboard and sensor info, and still you want to argue it's "something else".
    I give up.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    mrojas | # 56 | 2011-01-20, 22:17 | Report

    Originally Posted by Creamy Goodness View Post
    ncdk is a handest. its at the link i posted earlier running handest tests and getting bug reports to do with calls and SMS. they have 3 revisions listed (EB1 EB2 EB3). It has to be close to final by now. I even gave you the screen size and keyboard and sensor info, and still you want to argue it's "something else".
    I give up.
    The "final" in "close to final" can get very long. There is a reason why calls and SMS get debugged first; it's because they give the biggest revenue to carriers, so they can't fail, ever. Even considering that the handset have been thoroughly debugged; they still need to do live tests, durability, factories, marketing, etc etc

    All that can easily take months. That's why I believe the N9, based on ARM will be launched in Q3 2011, followed by an x86 tablet with voice capabilities in mid 2011, and a new x86 phone for Q3 2011.

    What delayed them? Getting Qt and UX's unified correctly so customers and developers can transition between devices with minimum hassle.

    Pure speculation on my part, btw.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    mikecomputing | # 57 | 2011-01-20, 22:23 | Report

    Originally Posted by bchliu View Post
    They'd have to be to remain competitive since everything else is going this direction. In fact, I'm willing to bet they will go one step further and come up with a QT JIT to standardise not just code - but binaries across the board as much as Android does the same way.

    QML is the answer to JIT

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Netweaver | # 58 | 2011-01-20, 22:30 | Report

    the nCDK runs at stock (max.) speed at 1.6 Ghz.
    Source : http://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12418

    Look in the 2nd attachment, the powertop log. :
    Originally Posted by
    Your CPU supports the following C-states : C1 C2 C4
    Your BIOS reports the following C-states : C1 C2 C4
    Cn Avg residency
    C0 (cpu running) ( 0.0%)
    polling 1.0ms ( 0.0%)
    C1 mwait 0.1ms ( 0.1%)
    C2 mwait 0.7ms ( 2.1%)
    C4 mwait 7.5ms (103.6%)
    P-states (frequencies)
    1.60 Ghz 5.4%
    1300 Mhz 0.2%
    1100 Mhz 11.8%
    900 Mhz 0.0%
    600 Mhz 82.6%
    Also, in the same log, plenty of technical drivers / chipnames, ready for translation in proper specs, some copied below:

    [QUOTE]100.0% i2c:lis3lv02d
    0.0% i2c:i2c_ledflash
    0.0% 00:04.2 SD Host controller: Intel Corporation Device 0822
    0.0% 00:04.1 SD Host controller: Intel Corporation Device 0821
    0.0% 00:04.0 SD Host controller: Intel Corporation Device 0820
    0.
    Originally Posted by
    0% 00:03.4 Communication controller: Intel Corporation Device 0819
    0.0% 00:03.3 Communication controller: Intel Corporation Device 0818
    0.0% 00:03.2 Communication controller: Intel Corporation Device 0817
    0.0% 00:03.1 Communication controller: Intel Corporation Device 0816
    0.0% 00:02.7 System peripheral: Intel Corporation Device 0832
    0.0% 00:02.6 System peripheral: Intel Corporation Device 0830
    0.0% 00:02.5 System peripheral: Intel Corporation Device 0827
    0.0% 00:02.3 USB Controller: Intel Corporation Device 0829
    0.0% 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Device 0130
    0.0% 00:01.4 System peripheral: Intel Corporation Device 0825
    0.0% 00:01.3 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corporation Device 082f
    0.0% 00:01.1 SD Host controller: Intel Corporation Device 0824
    0.0% 00:01.0 SD Host controller: Intel Corporation Device 0823
    0.0% 00:00.5 Communication controller: Intel Corporation Device 082e
    0.0% 00:00.4 Communication controller: Intel Corporation Device 082d
    0.0% 00:00.3 Communication controller: Intel Corporation Device 082c

    Devices without runtime PM
    i2c:i2c_TC35894-nEB1
    i2c:ak8975

    i2c:i2c_cam2_img_sen
    i2c:LW45-motor
    i2c:LW45-sensor

    i2c:i2c_msic_hdmi

    i2cn544

    i2c:ECI-nEB1
    i2c:Sil9234-nEB1
    i2c:i2c_fm
    i2c:bcm4751-gps

    i2c:bh1770glc
    i2c:lp5523
    i2c:mXT224
    I'm sure there're still plenty of goodies to find in other bug details

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Netweaver For This Useful Post:
    c0rt3x, Creamy Goodness, pelago, pillar, Rauha

     
    Creamy Goodness | # 59 | 2011-01-20, 22:33 | Report

    Originally Posted by mrojas View Post
    The "final" in "close to final" can get very long. There is a reason why calls and SMS get debugged first; it's because they give the biggest revenue to carriers, so they can't fail, ever. Even considering that the handset have been thoroughly debugged; they still need to do live tests, durability, factories, marketing, etc etc

    All that can easily take months. That's why I believe the N9, based on ARM will be launched in Q3 2011, followed by an x86 tablet with voice capabilities in mid 2011, and a new x86 phone for Q3 2011.

    What delayed them? Getting Qt and UX's unified correctly so customers and developers can transition between devices with minimum hassle.

    Pure speculation on my part, btw.

    I see, so you think that Nokia, that will barely admit to the importance of MeeGo, actually is developing two MeeGo phones... And also is so insane they decided to skip making prototypes and testing of the N9, and will just test the n900 and this intel phone. Because that is exactly what you are implying when you say that this is not the N9 prototype...

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Creamy Goodness For This Useful Post:
    mrojas, Rauha, tissot

     
    NvyUs | # 60 | 2011-01-20, 22:34 | Report

    b/c its running handset UX does not mean its a handset and not a tablet, there's no official Tablet UX yet

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Page 6 of 15 | Prev |   4     5   6   7     8   | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout