Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    YOU have killed MeeGo/Qt

    Reply
    Page 3 of 4 | Prev |   1     2   3   4   | Next
    zimon | # 21 | 2011-02-15, 21:20 | Report

    Originally Posted by alcalde View Post
    Compatibility makes no sense if you're on the bottom. ...

    And lastly, why should Nokia pay all the R&D costs to build and maintain MeeGo, pay to install Alien Dalvik, and let Google make money from the app store sales that they'll then channel into competing with you? Why not just put Android on for nothing and save all the R&D costs and licensing fees?
    As I said, I know couple of Android-app-developers, and if they could get "real" Linux instead of Android cribbled Linux, they would change, only if they could still develop with Java. Meego is "real" Linux.
    Meego is ready. If Nokia makes GUI to it for smart phones, it doesn't have to release for free for competitors, if it writes the GUI on top of LGPL resources, and besides Nokia owns Qt.

    And Alien Dalvik, as I said, surely costs less than license to WP7. So, if they (Elop) is willing to pay for WP7, why not Alien Dalvik, when it would be the winning strategy. Meego-phones would immediately get enough apps to go over the "critical mass".

    And there is no reason why Ovi couldn't have Android-apps also, if they get installed cleanly to Meego-device and works after that under (any) Dalvik VM.
    Besides, selling apps currently is not profitable to Google either.

    One more extra option would be to develop QTJambi futher, so those who absolutely just want to develop in Java, could also use Qt to make them more efficient Java-apps and skip Android-oddities.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by zimon; 2011-02-15 at 21:26.

     
    windows7 | # 22 | 2011-02-15, 21:28 | Report

    i hear that google earth is made with qt.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    ndi | # 23 | 2011-02-15, 21:55 | Report

    Picture posts already?

    I'll get my shovel.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    tebsu | # 24 | 2011-02-15, 22:00 | Report

    i am sorry but,.. it was my fault.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    m4r0v3r | # 25 | 2011-02-15, 22:10 | Report

    so... why the **** did they move to an OS that barely has any applications?...

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    danramos | # 26 | 2011-02-15, 22:21 | Report

    Don't blame me, I voted for the other guy.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post:
    Hootenholler

     
    JamesBond@ge | # 27 | 2011-03-19, 18:50 | Report

    I killed it may'an.

    Holy guacomole.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    retsaw | # 28 | 2011-03-19, 19:38 | Report

    Originally Posted by zimon View Post
    The license for Alien Dalvik costs surely less than a license to WP7.
    That's questionable. According to rumours Nokia is getting $1billion to promote and develop WP7 handsets, and we don't know how much Nokia is paying per handset to license WP7, it would fit Microsofts MO to give it to Nokia cheap to secure the deal in the same way they started doing cheap versions of Windows for netbooks to kill off Linux on netbooks.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    sak500 | # 29 | 2011-03-19, 20:25 | Report

    No NOkia should have listened to you and developed another N9xx for a platform which would have been used by 0.00002% of cell phone owners and 0.0001% of devs to make something decent for people to use other than making calls.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to sak500 For This Useful Post:
    Rebeldiamond

     
    gerbick | # 30 | 2011-03-19, 21:42 | Report

    Yes, it deserved to die... and I hope it burns in hell!

    Sorry... I had to do it. I don't think that Maemo/MeeGo/Qt was utilized to the best of it's potential, it didn't gather enough 3rd party vendors that would have stayed with it, and Nokia didn't market it well to help increase the adoption rate.

    Simply put, I'm not surprised it "died", any parts of it. But I think Nokia is to blame. Not this community... Nokia.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Page 3 of 4 | Prev |   1     2   3   4   | Next
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout