![]() |
2011-02-21
, 00:21
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Prague
|
#2
|
![]() |
2011-02-21
, 01:28
|
Posts: 2,225 |
Thanked: 3,822 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Florida
|
#3
|
![]() |
2011-02-21
, 02:28
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Prague
|
#4
|
![]() |
2011-02-21
, 02:46
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Prague
|
#6
|
![]() |
2011-02-21
, 02:52
|
|
Posts: 1,030 |
Thanked: 792 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
|
#7
|
![]() |
2011-02-21
, 03:04
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Prague
|
#8
|
![]() |
2011-02-21
, 23:06
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Prague
|
#9
|
![]() |
2011-02-21
, 23:10
|
Posts: 1,680 |
Thanked: 3,685 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
|
#10
|
I found this odd so I analysed the file with wireshark and found the 4 wpa handshake packets I was expecting. I then transfered the .cap file to my linux box and used aircrack again, there was indeed a wpa handshake in there. I then transfered some .cap files to my n900 that I know have valid handshakes and on the n900 they all say no valid handshake found.
I've attached a .cap file (its from my network, the wpa password is 'password') this file was captured on the n900 and according to both the windows and linux versions of aircrack it contains a valid handshake. I know it does I've seen the packets in wireshark.
The version of aircrack-ng I'm using on the n900 is 1.0 and it does not see the handshake in that file.
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks
Dave