[ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900 - Page 278 - maemo.org

carbonjha | # 2771 | 2011-12-03, 03:57 | Report

Originally Posted by raverpol View Post

what if I use qtlockscreen and I don't have dbus-scripts folder? all I can find in etc is dbus-scripts.d and tow files inside

Im so sorry. the path was incorrect! the correct path for cpu_sleep & cpu_normal is /opt/dbus-scripts/
so sorry guys!!

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to carbonjha For This Useful Post:
dotnixau, raverpol

raverpol | # 2772 | 2011-12-03, 11:51 | Report

Originally Posted by carbonjha View Post

@All
qtlockscreen users can test this

add this line in /opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_sleep

Code:

renice -1 `pgrep qtlockscreen`

this will increase the priority of qtlockscreen when using

and in /opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_normal

Code:

renice 19 `pgrep qtlockscreen`

this will decrease the priority of qtlockscreen when screen is unlocked

ok, does it important where, in which line, should I put those two lines?

ed_boner | # 2773 | 2011-12-03, 19:35 | Report

its oficial...witn kp49 and dsp profile..if i install batterypatch i spend more battery..as for speespatch..same old xtem message??..i am uninstalling this..thks a lot karam for all your amazing work..you changed my n900 life..but this time you were outnumbered.

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ed_boner For This Useful Post:
corduroysack, don_falcone, freemangordon

AKEEL | # 2774 | 2011-12-03, 21:27 | Report

Hi,
After installing new battery patch, my phone goes in reboot loop. I am using KP42.
I restored via Backupmenu and BatteryPatch.v2 is working fine.

Last edited by AKEEL; 2011-12-03 at 21:37.

karam | # 2775 | 2011-12-04, 04:08 | Report

@carboniha

Originally Posted by carbonjha View Post

@karam
thanks a lot for the update

I think it is important to renice the processes of cpu_sleep back to 0 in cpu_normal
otherwise their nice value will always remain 1 & the processes will be ignored during cpu load

/opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_normal

Code:

renice 0 `pgrep modest`
renice 0 `pgrep browserd`
renice 0 `pgrep image-viewer`

@All
qtlockscreen users can test this

add this line in /opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_sleep

Code:

renice -1 `pgrep qtlockscreen`

this will increase the priority of qtlockscreen when using

and in /opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_normal

Code:

renice 19 `pgrep qtlockscreen`

this will decrease the priority of qtlockscreen when screen is unlocked

i don't think it's important to do renice 0 in
/opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_normal

because it takes up more battery on continues usage and it doesn't increase the performance

but about qtlockscreen
as for me i don't use it
but i will create a new package called : batterypatch-testing
including all the unfinished tests and when something is confirmed
i'm going to move it batterypatch (the stable current one)

@AKEEL

do you have unstable N900 ? when activating smartrelfex ?
this is strange

@ed_boner

that's your opinion and i respect it but :

Originally Posted by ed_boner View Post

i was using kp49 with no patch only dsp profile and was really happy with it...last night i installed this patches..i do not have any monitoring tool but my n900 imediately seemed faster...as for the battery i believe it is much worse than without batterypatch and dsp profile..is this possible?

Originally Posted by ed_boner View Post

its oficial...witn kp49 and dsp profile..if i install batterypatch i spend more battery..as for speespatch..same old xtem message??..i am uninstalling this..thks a lot karam for all your amazing work..you changed my n900 life..but this time you were outnumbered.

comparing the above 2 posts i can't seem to understand what is exactly is your problem ?
less battery with batterypatch?
more battery with batterypatch?
less performance with speedpatch?
more performance with speedpatch?
the xterm message stays up your tail?
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
dsp profiles is just like overclock profile except the voltages (overclock has the stock ones) to prevent reboots
although smartreflex has it's own voltages which apply them on the cpu (so probably the voltages in overclock are ignored ?)

but with batterypatch :
vfs trick ... gives a lot of extra standby renice ... the same
and conversative mode in overclock gives a longer continues usage time

forgive me if i miss understand you but i made my point clear

@All
sorry for taking long to update the 1st post
this should be done soon

Last edited by karam; 2011-12-04 at 04:10.

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to karam For This Useful Post:
ahmadamaj, visN900

AKEEL | # 2776 | 2011-12-04, 05:56 | Report

Originally Posted by karam View Post

do you have unstable N900 ? when activating smartrelfex ?
this is strange

Yes, Its shows desktop and reboot itself. Previous BatteryPatch v2 is working fine.
SmartReflex is active. VDD1=0, VDD2=1.
Is it bcoz of old KP version?
I am using KP42, bcoz my bluetooth headset Nokia BH-214 is working stable only with KP42.

karam | # 2777 | 2011-12-04, 11:27 | Report

yes this is one of the reasons
but the latest version detects the kernel-power version installed
and installs the patch according to it
======== if you are using KP42-46-47-48 batterypatch should activate vdd1=1 and vdd2=1 but the MAXfreq is 750 (stable with vdd1)
maybe your N900 is not even stable with 750

solutions :

1-) install the latest KPv49 (maybe will solve your problem or maybe not) and then update to the latest batterypatch

2-) if you have v2 installed (the older one)
then :

Code:

sudo gainroot
mkdir temp
cd temp
apt-get install -d batterypatch # press y after that and make sure you did apt-get update before with devel-enabled
mv /var/cache/apt/archives/batterypatch* ./batterypatch
dpkg -x batterypatch ./
rm -r /opt/dbus-scripts
mv dbus-scripts /opt
chmod -R +rwx /opt/dbus-scripts
mv etc/dbus-scripts.d/* /etc/dbus-scripts.d/
cd ..
rm -r temp

PS: it's safe to uninstall it from HAM too

this will let you have an updated batterypatch features without VDD1 enabled
.........
it could've been easier with editing overclock profile only
but as you said that you have a reboot loop
then those are the only solutions

Last edited by karam; 2011-12-04 at 11:29.

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to karam For This Useful Post:
abhirajsoni, ed_boner

willi6868 | # 2778 | 2011-12-04, 12:24 | Report

What is the actual max. frequence with batterypatch? I'm using speedpatch, kernel-power v49 and 720p rec/watch.

@karam: It would be great if u update the first post with the supported/max frequencies.

Last edited by willi6868; 2011-12-04 at 12:27.

ed_boner | # 2779 | 2011-12-04, 12:31 | Report

tks for answering karam..maybe my english is not the best..the twoquoted statements say the same thing for me..with speedpatch the phone seems faster but i am kind of disapointed abot the xterm message and about batterypatch..well in my experience for now,although i understand your theory, dlesnt work for me as i could confirm it drains mmore battery...hope you dont take this the wrong way as you are one of my n900 heroes..hope you continue to work and improve and in a near future prove me wrong.

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ed_boner For This Useful Post:
corduroysack, karam

GomerS | # 2780 | 2011-12-04, 16:17 | Report

I will not find in this theme of a command how again to activate all configs cpu_sleep and cpu_normal. I them пересобрал itself a little and here after reboot they probably won't earn, updated QCUFreq, but the new version didn't show temperature as I am necessary also was rolled away back and have stuck save and and there is empty still, now works but I can it have made cancellation of options. Also I remember here commands were. For returning of 2 parameters and configuration automatic loading

Last edited by GomerS; 2011-12-04 at 16:20.