Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    COmmunity rant thread.

    Reply
    Page 19 of 36 | Prev | 9   17     18   19   20     21   29 | Next | Last
    ysss | # 181 | 2011-08-05, 19:27 | Report

    No.

    Just one of many wrong assumptions made (and acted upon) resulting in poor communication.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    gerbick | # 182 | 2011-08-05, 19:50 | Report

    Originally Posted by misterc View Post
    is it so difficult to follow a discussion.
    When it makes no sense as to why it's ongoing, yes. It is quite difficult to follow a discussion.

    And why are you handing out free sex changes?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    sjgadsby | # 183 | 2011-08-05, 19:56 | Report

    Originally Posted by misterc View Post
    btw, when you (moderators) look @ a thread, your IDs don't show on the list but you still add up to the number of ppl viewing as members.
    That's not moderators; that's people who have checked the "Use Invisible Mode" box. Granted, those sets do intersect.

    (And some people can see invisible people.)

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    daperl | # 184 | 2011-08-05, 20:03 | Report

    Originally Posted by misterc View Post
    what you are thinking of, in whatever form, requires multiple joins on the "ignore list" table.
    You're thinking too big and too unoptimized. Any joins would be very small, number matrix joins of data that would only be fetched once per page request in the worst case:

    requesting member ignore list uids x post "quoted user" uids (mostly 1, rarely >= 2, often 0)

    And of the three major steps of normal forum usage, these small, simple comparisons would only be needed in steps two and three.

    Some server-side functions that would need modifying:
    • Add, change or delete a post
    • Request a list of unread threads
    • Request a thread

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    misterc | # 185 | 2011-08-05, 20:05 | Report

    Originally Posted by sjgadsby View Post
    That's not moderators; that's people who have checked the "Use Invisible Mode" box. Granted, those sets do intersect.

    (And some people can see invisible people.)
    i'm sure you can
    well, that leaves the outbox to be added...

    BTW: what are you afraid off, that you don't want to show your ID?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by misterc; 2011-08-05 at 21:15.

     
    misterc | # 186 | 2011-08-05, 20:29 | Report

    Originally Posted by
    You're thinking too big and too unoptimized. Any joins would be very small, number matrix joins of data that would only be fetched once per page request in the worst case:

    requesting member ignore list uids x post "quoted user" uids (mostly 1, rarely >= 2, often 0)
    matrix?
    i'd see a tensor / 3rd dimension (10 posts per page)?

    Originally Posted by daperl View Post
    And of the three major steps of normal forum usage, these small, simple comparisons would only be needed in steps two and three.
    you see, this is where i start having a problem...
    what if your feature has such a success that everybody starts adding 1/2 a dozen ppl to his/her ignore list...
    • user opens forum page
    • for all the authors of posts on that page, check normal ignore list
    • for all posts with quote, check if quoted author is on ignore list
      • like i put on the 1st quote now, i removed the ID part thus you are not identified as author any more but it's still your post, isn't it?
      • my main problem, i still don't understand what more / else you intend to implement, thus...
    • simply don't display a post quoting an listed author?
      • what if a post quotes several posts from different authors?

    Originally Posted by daperl View Post
    Some server-side functions that would need modifying:
    • Add, change or delete a post
    • Request a list of unread threads
    • Request a thread
    when i see your last list, i can't help feeling i'm missing something here...
    like i said, not clear to me what your feature will achieve, thus tricky to asses the impacts. which is a no-no in terms of development. no offence.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    daperl | # 187 | 2011-08-05, 20:52 | Report

    Originally Posted by misterc View Post
    thus tricky to asses the impacts. which is a no-no in terms of development.
    One of the most beautiful things about the web is that if you want to know the impact of a new feature, you've already collected the test data.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    misterc | # 188 | 2011-08-05, 20:55 | Report

    Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
    When it makes no sense as to why it's ongoing, yes. It is quite difficult to follow a discussion.

    [...]
    two things...
    • just because it doesn't make any sense to you doesn't mean it doesn't make sense, does it, now?
    • check the 1st post of this thread, and then.. .... ...

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    misterc | # 189 | 2011-08-05, 20:59 | Report

    Originally Posted by daperl View Post
    One of the most beautiful things about the web is that if you want to know the impact of a new feature, you've already collected the test data.
    so you are feeding the rambling (and trolling) web with rambling (and trolling?) features, are you?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    daperl | # 190 | 2011-08-05, 21:16 | Report

    Originally Posted by misterc View Post
    so you are feeding the rambling (and trolling) web with rambling (and trolling?) features, are you?
    Actually, if such a thing were implemented, the quality of forum web traffic could improve an order of magnitude, but that might be bad for you.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Page 19 of 36 | Prev | 9   17     18   19   20     21   29 | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout