|
|
2011-09-28
, 22:53
|
|
Posts: 1,341 |
Thanked: 708 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#92
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to zimon For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-09-28
, 23:29
|
|
Posts: 70 |
Thanked: 185 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ UK
|
#93
|
The most annoying and wrong-headed thing about MeeGo is their promotion of Qt as the preferred (and sometimes 'required') native toolkit.
Linux-with-Qt-required isn't Linux, it's a travesty.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to caa For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-09-28
, 23:55
|
|
|
Posts: 1,309 |
Thanked: 1,187 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#94
|
But that's a problem, isn't it? What's the point of developing yet another platform which will support HTML5, especially if it *only* supports HTML5? If HTML5 apps eventually are found to be just as good as native apps (which I doubt will be the case), then Android/iOS/ZunePhone will support them, (...)
(...) and there's no need for Tizen. They aren't even aspiring to create anything that would differentiate them from the existing, increasingly entrenched, market leaders.
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to volt For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-09-29
, 00:00
|
|
|
Posts: 1,309 |
Thanked: 1,187 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#95
|
This may not be of interest to you as the advice comes from Steve Jobs, but there is a short piece of relevant advice in the video here.
Thanks,
Linux-with-Qt-required is BETTER than Linux-with-any-and-EVERY-toolkit-going, for mobile purposes.
This is because as well as good native performance, it can provide a more consistent user experience across different applications and devices (when developed a certain way), which is extremely important in the mobile space in order to achieve better usability (i.e. ISO-9241 effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, and ease of learning etc). This is the kind of thing that helps a 'platform' to gain traction with the actual public, which in turn brings more developers in, etc.
Of course as you are probably aware it also provides a cross platform IDE, or even the option to develop within Visual Studio if desired.
It also means that optimisations can be concentrated on one area/toolkit rather than across multiple different toolkits.
| The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to volt For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-09-29
, 00:53
|
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#96
|
|
|
2011-09-29
, 02:03
|
|
|
Posts: 51 |
Thanked: 152 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Detroit, MI
|
#97
|
| The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to arcticrobot For This Useful Post: | ||
b-man, Bartus, Crashdamage, don_falcone, erendorn, Estel, fw190, Hootenholler, ivyking, Jedibeeftrix, pavlik, TurboDragon, Venty, volt, whayong, ysss, Zoxir | ||
|
|
2011-09-29
, 03:23
|
|
Posts: 457 |
Thanked: 600 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#98
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Rugoz For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-09-29
, 04:00
|
|
Posts: 163 |
Thanked: 256 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#99
|
Linux-with-Qt-required is BETTER than Linux-with-any-and-EVERY-toolkit-going, for mobile purposes.
This is because as well as good native performance, it can provide a more consistent user experience across different applications and devices (when developed a certain way), which is extremely important in the mobile space in order to achieve better usability.
|
|
2011-09-29
, 04:13
|
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#100
|
To hell with 'consistent user experience'. The apps I use don't provide a consistent user experience -- and that's exactly why they're good apps and why I use them.
A 'consistent user experience' is a bollocks buzzword used by computer-illiterate marketing robots, not something for real people with real needs.
| The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to ysss For This Useful Post: | ||
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-1tJI87sRhZ...ection_064.png
Hopefully this will be a wake up call for Nokia and they will get on board with Tizen too. Remember that Tizen is owned by LF and is said to be 100% open source so it's nothing stopping anyone to use it if they want to.
But the WM7 "horse" has a blood lineage tracing back to donkeys such as WM6.5, 6.1, 6.0, 5.1 that was fully neglected for too many years and Microsoft did sweet F all to maintain it (still running on Pocket IE4/6!!).