automagic68 | # 61 | 2012-10-22, 16:09 | Report

What's the status on this?

thedead1440 | # 62 | 2012-10-23, 07:38 | Report

Looks like romaxa has resumed work on it

http://hg.mozilla.org/users/romaxa_gmail.com/qtmozembed

AudioSculpt | # 63 | 2012-10-28, 15:53 | Report

Did he solved the UI problem?

thedead1440 | # 64 | 2012-10-28, 15:55 | Report

Send him a PM and ask him to update on this thread?

romaxa | # 65 | 2012-11-05, 05:06 | Report

No UI problem not yet solved, I just started QML UI prototype using Threaded rendering model, which is very close to Android Firefox rendering model.

bandora | # 66 | 2012-11-05, 05:16 | Report

I just wanted to say that I can't wait for a release of this with a decent UI.. I will be more than happy to test it out and give feedback!

thedead1440 | # 67 | 2012-11-05, 05:32 | Report

romaxa,

any indication on when we may get it?

Thanks!

shmerl | # 68 | 2012-11-05, 08:05 | Report

romaxa: What do you think about the progress of OMTC development? If it can work efficiently (i.e. produce very responsive UI), then there won't be a need for extra UI layer - just regular XUL UI would need to be brought in sync with current mobile Firefox design.

AudioSculpt | # 69 | 2012-11-19, 12:02 | Report

Is there a .deb file for test this browser?

Kabouik | # 70 | 2012-11-20, 02:37 | Report

An HeliumReborn-like UI would be awsome. Simple, desktop fashioned, self explanatory icons, no obscure gesture-based actions to do simple things. I really hate these "touch friendly" UIs where everything has to be totally different from desktop UIs (with non self-explanatory icons or gestures) with all buttons hidden by default unless you tap somewhere to make them appear. I mean there is enough space on the screen to show basic buttons and avoid the Mobile Firefox UI. MicroB UI was great, it gathered the best of both worlds. Helium UI has some similar pros.

Whatever the UI, keep up the great work Romaxa!