tommo | # 161 | 2014-01-31, 07:59 | Report

cant wait!
btw you should have copyright on the doodle face, just someone at crackberry with the same!

Bundyo | # 162 | 2014-01-31, 08:47 | Report

While I like the polished plastic on Sculteo, it is rather rough and feels like paper on touch.

As I've said to dirkvl, I've heard that i.materialise.com is better quality-wise, though never ordered from them. Both sites offer sample kits for 30 EUR with 25 EUR off voucher for next purchase, so it is rather the same on that front if you stick with the one you get the samples from.

On the shipping side, i.materialise is better - they offer one day shipping for 14 EUR and 5 day for 13, while Sculpteo only have 12 EUR for one week (or more).

andreas1 | # 163 | 2014-01-31, 08:55 | Report

I am surely interested to have one,

just a few questions (faq to first post )

What is the increase in weight compared to a normal toh-jolla?
what is the increase in "thickness" compared to a normal toh-jolla?
Is there any estimation concerning battery usage?
Will the toh be without the meme-head?
Will the "quality" of toh surcface be polished like in a normal toh-jolla compared to the demo-version, which seems a bit "unpolished"?
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-B...o/14010025.jpg

-
Edit. added more questions.

---

Last edited by andreas1; 2014-01-31 at 10:28.

kimmoli | # 164 | 2014-01-31, 20:01 | Report

Here are some answers

• What is the increase in weight compared to a normal toh-jolla?

  with my current PLA printed one, weight increase is 2 g (total 143 g)

• what is the increase in "thickness" compared to a normal toh-jolla?

  About +1.8 mm (new thickness 11.7 mm ,original by spec 9.9 mm)

• Is there any estimation concerning battery usage?

  Some results, see here

• Will the toh be without the meme-head?

  See post #1. It will be available with or without (It will be on inside anyway)

• Will the "quality" of toh surcface be polished like in a normal toh-jolla compared to the demo-version, which seems a bit "unpolished"?

  TBD (demo is printed with my own printer.) Still looking for best supplier.
  But it is kinda ok for me. not so slippery as the original toh. but looks like "selfmade" when taking a closer look.

---

Last edited by kimmoli; 2014-02-01 at 07:35.

minimos | # 165 | 2014-01-31, 21:49 | Report

I hope you mean that the total thickness will be 11.7 mm, not that the *increase* will be 11.7 mm. Right?

xkkkx | # 166 | 2014-01-31, 23:19 | Report

I think that's the case as he is comparing directly the original total thickness 9.9mm to TOHOLED 11.7mm

Rauha | # 167 | 2014-01-31, 23:26 | Report

Is it not pretty clear from the pictures that total thickness won't increase by 118%?

Phone + TOHOLED = 11,7mm

Bundyo | # 168 | 2014-02-01, 07:40 | Report

Well, he could have fit an Arduino in those 1.1cm

kimmoli | # 169 | 2014-02-01, 07:41 | Report

So does this mean that you'll wait for that and skip oled?

kimmoli | # 170 | 2014-02-01, 17:33 | Report

I tried i-materialise --> not like.

first it took several hours to get my account confirmation link.

Then it says minimum wall thinkness 0.8 - 1mm, detail 0.3mm tolerances +/-0.3mm

And then very limited color selections; and this part is too large to be polished (tumbled)

But finally got test of natural polyamide ordered. lets see.

Attached Images