Kangal | # 21 | 2014-11-22, 05:34 | Report

No need to call me names, jks

That was overkill with the filter.

Tigerroast | # 22 | 2014-11-22, 19:49 | Report

Wait, why is m-o-r-o-n censored?

Why is there a profanity filter? Do puritans run this site? Hello?

pichlo | # 23 | 2014-11-22, 19:59 | Report

More to the point, why is o-xy-mo-ron censored? I thought the filter had been adjusted to trigger on whole words only, to avoid the smart-watch nonsense.

juiceme | # 24 | 2014-11-22, 23:01 | Report

The filter needs to be adjusted to each case by hand I guess.
Chemist knows about it, so you might want to ask him...

Tigerroast | # 25 | 2014-11-22, 23:08 | Report

Adjusted? The filter needs to be vivisected.

juiceme | # 26 | 2014-11-22, 23:15 | Report

I agree it is unnecessary but that is only my opinion.

There was a lengthy discussion on the filter some time ago and the verdict was that it should stay but be modified so that it does not give false positives.

Tigerroast | # 27 | 2014-11-23, 02:03 | Report

Knowing that the filter's parameters, as well as the concept of a profanity filter, are quite puritanistic, many people were convinced that it was for the better? Alrighty then.