Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 12 | Thanked: 1 time | Joined on Nov 2009
#111
I've just started to use claws mail (which is in the extra devel repository) which I was used to in my previous n800.

anyone knows when it will be in the official repositories.

Can it be connected to the n900 contatcts?

thanks in advance
 
Helmuth's Avatar
Posts: 1,259 | Thanked: 1,341 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Germany
#112
I miss the possibility to sort mails since PR1.2 - anyone else?
Then please vote for this Bug Report: #10332
 
Posts: 1 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ Indianapolis
#113
Has anyone found anything to help with modest and it's incessant CPU usage and very slow responsiveness?

Mine constantly uses 100% CPU for long periods of time (a minute or more) since installing 1.2, and my battery can hardly last a few hours because of it.

I run Conky and see modest at the top of the list constantly. I have one MFE account, one IMAP account (gmail), and one POP account.

Here's a Conky screenhot showing the trend:



Any ideas? Seems like no real answers have been found yet but thought I'd add to the list
 
Posts: 53 | Thanked: 8 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#114
I have the same problem. It's driving me up the walls. For such a slick phone, amazing hardware, to be so LIMITED when it comes to email is frankly shocking.

I firmly believe that this flaw will be the death of the N900. There is no way I can recommend this phone to people because of the atrocious email client. Previous to 1.2 I was telling people, "there's an update coming, it might be alright", now I'm just honest with them, "this phone can't handle email properly, stay away from it".

I wish I didn't have to say, but there's no way I'm going to recommend something this brutal.

And the frustrating thing is that there seems to be NOTHING that we, as a community, can do. The frustration of impotence!
 

The Following User Says Thank You to edanto For This Useful Post:
Posts: 29 | Thanked: 6 times | Joined on Jan 2008
#115
FYI - I have the same problem. Every now and again I see Modest gobbling up massive amounts of CPU. grrrrr
 
Posts: 79 | Thanked: 42 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ London
#116
Originally Posted by edanto View Post
I have the same problem. It's driving me up the walls. For such a slick phone, amazing hardware, to be so LIMITED when it comes to email is frankly shocking.
...
And the frustrating thing is that there seems to be NOTHING that we, as a community, can do. The frustration of impotence!
I share your frustration edanto...

Just about the only thing the community can do to get Nokia out of its complacent ivory tower and take notice is to vote for bugs and suggest solutions to shortcomings in brainstorms. This one here is dedicated to "Modest".
__________________
Please contribute to Brainstorm: "Bridge the gap between Modest and competing smartphone email clients"
 
Posts: 53 | Thanked: 8 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#117
Indeed!

I posted a solution on that brainstorm a few months back but it still only has 26 votes. Not the overwhelming response I was hoping for!
 
Posts: 53 | Thanked: 8 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#118
Is there any way that we could get in touch with the developers of the mail client to ask them about improving it?!
 
Posts: 671 | Thanked: 1,630 times | Joined on Aug 2010
#119
Anyone notice the vast improvements in the email client [modest] following the recent upgrade to PR 1.3 ?
__________________
Three n900s: One for stable working platform,
One for development testing Chopping Onions
One for saltwater immersion power testing resurrected ! parts scavenging

My Mods for Wonko's Advanced Clock Plugin:
ISO8601 clock mod and Momental_IST clock mod

Printing your Email with the N900
 
Posts: 559 | Thanked: 166 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Cyprus
#120
Originally Posted by theonelaw View Post
Anyone notice the vast improvements in the email client [modest] following the recent upgrade to PR 1.3 ?
It`s faster now....but still 'mark all as read' doesn`t exist!
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:21.